What Drives Academic Data Sharing?

被引:226
作者
Fecher, Benedikt [1 ,2 ]
Friesike, Sascha [1 ]
Hebing, Marcel [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexander von Humboldt Inst Internet & Soc, Berlin, Germany
[2] German Inst Econ Res, Berlin, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
BIODIVERSITY DATA; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; IMAGE DATA; REQUIREMENTS; SCIENCE; PUBLICATION; ECONOMICS; METADATA; LESSONS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0118053
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite widespread support from policy makers, funding agencies, and scientific journals, academic researchers rarely make their research data available to others. At the same time, data sharing in research is attributed a vast potential for scientific progress. It allows the reproducibility of study results and the reuse of old data for new research questions. Based on a systematic review of 98 scholarly papers and an empirical survey among 603 secondary data users, we develop a conceptual framework that explains the process of data sharing from the primary researcher's point of view. We show that this process can be divided into six descriptive categories: Data donor, research organization, research community, norms, data infrastructure, and data recipients. Drawing from our findings, we discuss theoretical implications regarding knowledge creation and dissemination as well as research policy measures to foster academic collaboration. We conclude that research data cannot be regarded as knowledge commons, but research policies that better incentivise data sharing are needed to improve the quality of research results and foster scientific progress.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 126 条
[51]   The user's view on biodiversity data sharing - Investigating facts of acceptance and requirements to realize a sustainable use of research data [J].
Enke, Neela ;
Thessen, Anne ;
Bach, Kerstin ;
Bendix, Joerg ;
Seeger, Bernhard ;
Gemeinholzer, Birgit .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2012, 11 :25-33
[52]  
European Commission, 2012, SCI DAT OP ACC RES R
[53]   Educating for the future: another important benefit of data sharing [J].
Feldman, Lindsay ;
Patel, Deesha ;
Ortmann, Leonard ;
Robinson, Kara ;
Popovic, Tanja .
LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829) :1877-1878
[54]  
Fernandez Jose M., 2012, Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2012 Workshops, USEC and WECSR 2012. Revised Selected Papers, P136, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-34638-5_13
[55]   Governing the data commons: Policy, practice, and the advancement of science [J].
Fisher, Joshua B. ;
Fortmann, Louise .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 47 (04) :237-245
[56]   Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects [J].
Franzoni, Chiara ;
Sauermann, Henry .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (01) :1-20
[57]   Image Data Sharing for Biomedical Research-Meeting HIPAA Requirements for De-identification [J].
Freymann, John B. ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Perry, John H. ;
Clunie, David A. ;
Jaffe, C. Carl .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2012, 25 (01) :14-24
[58]   A test of the individual action model for organizational information commons [J].
Fulk, J ;
Heino, R ;
Flanagin, AJ ;
Monge, PR ;
Bar, F .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :569-585
[59]   Towards effective and rewarding data sharing [J].
Gardner, D ;
Toga, AW ;
Ascoli, GA ;
Beatty, JT ;
Brinkley, JF ;
Dale, AM ;
Fox, PT ;
Gardner, EP ;
George, JS ;
Goddard, N ;
Harris, KM ;
Herskovits, EH ;
Hines, ML ;
Jacobs, GA ;
Jacobs, RE ;
Jones, EG ;
Kennedy, DN ;
Kimberg, DY ;
Mazziotta, JC ;
Miller, PL ;
Mori, S ;
Mountain, DC ;
Reiss, AL ;
Rosen, GD ;
Rottenberg, DA ;
Shepherd, GM ;
Smalheiser, NR ;
Smith, KP ;
Strachan, T ;
Van Essen, DC ;
Williams, RW ;
Wong, STC .
NEUROINFORMATICS, 2003, 1 (03) :289-295
[60]   Nothing is really safe': a focus group study on the processes of anonymizing and sharing of health data for research purposes [J].
Haddow, Gill ;
Bruce, Ann ;
Sathanandam, Shiva ;
Wyatt, Jeremy C. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (06) :1140-1146