Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography

被引:16
作者
Grahn, A [1 ]
Hemdal, B
Andersson, I
Ruschin, M
Thilander-Klang, A
Börjesson, S
Tingberg, A
Mattsson, S
Håkansson, M
Båth, M
Månsson, LG
Medin, J
Warmingerl, F
Panzer, W
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Radiat Protect, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nch573
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission (EC) quality criteria for screen-film mammography are used as a tool to assess image quality. A new set of criteria was developed and initially tested in a previous study. In the present study, these criteria are further evaluated using screen-film mammograms that have been digitised, manipulated to simulate different image quality levels and reprinted on film. Expert radiologists have evaluated these manipulated images using both the original (EC) and the new criteria. A comparison of three different simulated dose levels reveals that the new criteria yield a larger separation of image criteria scores than the old ones. These results indicate that the new set of image quality criteria has a higher discriminative power than the old set and thus seems to be more suitable for evaluation of image quality in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 394
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria [J].
Almén, A ;
Tingberg, A ;
Mattsson, S ;
Besjakov, J ;
Kheddache, S ;
Lanhede, B ;
Månsson, LG ;
Zankl, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 73 (875) :1192-1199
[2]   The use of reference image criteria in X-ray diagnostics:: an application for the optimisation of lumbar spine radiographs [J].
Almén, A ;
Tingberg, A ;
Besjakov, J ;
Mattsson, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (09) :1561-1567
[3]   The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial [J].
Bjurstam, N ;
Björneld, L ;
Warwick, J ;
Sala, E ;
Duffy, SW ;
Nyström, L ;
Walker, N ;
Cahlin, E ;
Eriksson, O ;
Hafström, LO ;
Lingaas, H ;
Mattsson, J ;
Persson, S ;
Rudenstam, CM ;
Salander, H ;
Säve-Söderbergh, J ;
Wahlin, T .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (10) :2387-2396
[4]   Breast dosimetry [J].
Dance, DR ;
Skinner, CL ;
Carlsson, GA .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1999, 50 (01) :185-203
[5]  
*EUR COMM, 2001, EUR GUID QUAL ASS MA
[6]  
*EUR COMM, 1996, 16263 EUR EUR COMM
[7]  
European Commission, 1996, 16260 EUR EUR COMM
[8]   Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography [J].
Grahn, A ;
Hemdal, B ;
Andersson, I ;
Ruschin, M ;
Thilander-Klang, A ;
Börjesson, S ;
Tingberg, A ;
Mattsson, S ;
Håkansson, M ;
Båth, M ;
Månsson, LG ;
Medin, J ;
Warmingerl, F ;
Panzer, W .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 114 (1-3) :389-394
[9]   The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria [J].
Lanhede, B ;
Båth, M ;
Kheddache, S ;
Sund, P ;
Björneld, L ;
Widell, M ;
Almén, A ;
Besjakov, J ;
Mattsson, S ;
Tingberg, A ;
Herrmann, C ;
Panzer, W ;
Zankl, M ;
Månsson, LG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (889) :38-49
[10]   The influence of different technique factors on image quality for chest radiographs:: Application of the recent CEC image quality criteria [J].
Lanhede, B ;
Tingberg, A ;
Månsson, LG ;
Kheddache, S ;
Widell, M ;
Björneld, L ;
Sund, P .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 90 (1-2) :203-206