Impact of self monitoring of blood glucose in the management of patients with non-insulin treated diabetes: open parallel group randomised trial

被引:279
作者
Farmer, Andrew [1 ]
Wade, Alisha
Goyder, Elizabeth
Yudkin, Patricia
French, David
Craven, Anthea
Holman, Rury
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Neil, Andrew
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Oxford OX2 7LF, England
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Coventry Univ, Appl Res Ctr Hlth & Lifestyle Intervent, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Diabet Trials Unit, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[7] Univ Oxford, Div Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7611期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39247.447431.BE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether self monitoring, alone or with instruction in incorporating the results into self care, is more effective than usual care in improving glycaemic control in non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Design Three arm, open, parallel group randomised trial. Setting 48 general practices in Oxfordshire and South Yorkshire. Participants 453 patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (mean age 65.7 years) for a median duration of three years and a mean haemoglobin A(1c) level of 7.5%. Interventions Standardised usual care with measurements of HbA(1c) every three months as the control group (n=152); blood glucose self monitoring with advice for patients to contact their doctor for interpretation of results, in addition to usual care (n=150); and blood glucose self monitoring with additional training of patients in interpretation and application of the results to enhance motivation and maintain adherence to a healthy lifestyle (n=151). Main outcome measure HbA(1c) level measured at 12 months. Results At 12 months the differences in HbA(1c) level between the three groups (adjusted for baseline HbA(1c), level) were not statistically significant (P=0.12). The difference in unadjusted mean change in HbA(1c) level from baseline to 12 months between the control and less intensive self monitoring groups was -0.14% (95% confidence interval -0.35% to 0.07%) and between the control and more intensive self monitoring groups was -0-17% (-0.37% to 0.03%). Conclusions Evidence is not convincing of an effect of self monitoring blood glucose, with or without instruction in incorporating findings into self care, in improving glycaemic control compared with usual care in reasonably welt controlled non-insulin treated patients with type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 136
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated diabetic patients: a longitudinal evaluation of its impact on metabolic control
    Franciosi, M
    Pellegrini, F
    De Berardis, G
    Belfiglio, M
    Di Nardo, B
    Greenfield, S
    Kaplan, SH
    Rossi, MCE
    Sacco, M
    Tognoni, G
    Valentini, M
    Nicolucci, A
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (07) : 900 - 906
  • [12] Clinicians can help their patients control postprandial hyperglycemia as a means of reducing cardiovascular risk
    Gerich, John E.
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2006, 32 (04) : 513 - +
  • [13] Self-monitoring of blood glucose significantly improves metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:: the Auto-Surveillance Intervention Active (ASIA) study
    Guerci, B
    Drouin, P
    Grangé, V
    Bougnères, P
    Fontaine, P
    Kerlan, V
    Passa, P
    Thivolet, C
    Vialettes, B
    Charbonnel, B
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2003, 29 (06) : 587 - 594
  • [14] Interventions to prevent weight gain: a systematic review of psychological models and behaviour change methods
    Hardeman, W
    Griffin, S
    Johnston, M
    Kinmonth, AL
    Wareham, NJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2000, 24 (02) : 131 - 143
  • [15] A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation
    Hardeman, W
    Sutton, S
    Griffin, S
    Johnston, M
    White, A
    Wareham, NJ
    Kinmonth, AL
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (06) : 676 - 687
  • [16] Longitudinal study of new and prevalent use of self-monitoring of blood glucose
    Karter, Andrew J.
    Parker, Melissa M.
    Moffet, Howard H.
    Spence, Michele M.
    Chan, James
    Ettner, Susan L.
    Selby, Joe V.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (08) : 1757 - 1763
  • [17] Leventhal H., 1984, HDB PSYCHOL HLTH, V4, P219
  • [18] Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study
    Martin, S
    Schneider, B
    Heinemann, L
    Lodwig, V
    Kurth, HJ
    Kolb, H
    Scherbaum, W
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2006, 49 (02) : 271 - 278
  • [19] Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes
    Nathan, DM
    Cleary, PA
    Backlund, JYC
    Genuth, SM
    Lachin, JM
    Orchard, TJ
    Raskin, P
    Zinman, B
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (25) : 2643 - 2653
  • [20] *NNAT I CLIN EXC, 2002, MAN TYP 2 DIAB MAN B