Performance of two blue light-emitting-diode dental light curing units with distance and irradiation-time

被引:76
作者
Bennett, AW [1 ]
Watts, DC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Biomat Sci Unit, Turner Dent Sch, Manchester M15 6FH, Lancs, England
关键词
dental material; light emitting-diode; light curing; depth of cure; composite shade; exposure time;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00070-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Objectives. To assess the performance of two blue light-emitting-diode (LED) curing units, in terms of their spectral output and irradiance and the depth of cure (d(cure)) produced in standard hybrid and modified composites, compared with a conventional quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) light curing unit. Methods. The following light curing units (LCUs) were studied: Elipar-Freelight-1 LED (LED-1) 3 M-ESPE, Ultralume-2 LED (LED-2) Optident, and the Optilux-500 QTH (QTH-1) Sybron-Kerr. For each LCU, using a UV-visible spectro photo meter, the output spectrum was measured and the irradiance of emitted light as a function of source-detector distance. Three composites were studied of similar formulation but differing in their initiator concentrations and/or opacity. These were: Tetric Ceram (A3), Tetric Ceram HB containing an additional photoinitiator responding to similar to435 nm (A3) and Tetric Ceram Bleach (L). d(cure) was measured using a calibrated digital needle-penetrometer, as a function of source-specimen distance and for irradiance periods of 10, 20 and 40 s. Results. Each unit delivered a single peak in the blue region of the visible spectrum. The wavelength maxima for LED-1, LED-2 and QTH-1 were 486.4, 458.2 and 495.2 nm, respectively. Cure-depth (d(cure)) values varied significantly (p < 0.001) with irradiance times and source-specimen distance for both LED and QTH sources. The percentage reduction in d(cure) values resulting from LED versus QTH irradiance increased with source-specimen distance. Significance. The LED-LCUs had an energy-efficient spectral output for conventional composite curing but had a lower irradiance compared with the QTH-LCU, leading to reduced performance in depths of cure. Design improvements to provide greater irradiance from the LED-1 and to a lesser extent LED-2, should result in increased performance. (C) 2003 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2000, Optics and photonics, an introduction
[2]
Burke T, 1997, Prim Dent Care, V4, P91
[3]
A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based light-curing units [J].
Dunn, WJ ;
Bush, AC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 133 (03) :335-341
[4]
Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) [J].
Jandt, KD ;
Mills, RW ;
Blackwell, GB ;
Ashworth, SH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (01) :41-47
[5]
Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes [J].
Knezevic, A ;
Tarle, Z ;
Meniga, A ;
Sutalo, J ;
Pichler, G ;
Ristic, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (06) :586-591
[6]
Loney RW, 2001, OPER DENT, V26, P516
[7]
A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units [J].
Martin, FE .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (03) :239-243
[8]
Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology [J].
Mills, RW ;
Jandt, KD ;
Ashworth, SH .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 186 (08) :388-391
[9]
High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties [J].
Mills, RW ;
Uhl, A ;
Blackwell, GB ;
Jandt, KD .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (14) :2955-2963
[10]
The use and maintenance of visible light activating units in general practice [J].
Mitton, BA ;
Wilson, NHE .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2001, 191 (02) :82-86