共 10 条
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant patients
被引:31
作者:
Schroder, Jacob N.
Daneshmand, Mani A.
Villamizar, Nestor R.
Petersen, Rebecca P.
Blue, Laura J.
Welsby, Ian J.
Lodge, Andrew J.
Ortel, Thomas L.
Rogers, Joseph G.
Milano, Carmelo A.
机构:
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Durham, NC 27703 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Cardiac Anesthesia, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.049
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background. The presence of heparin- induced thrombocytopenia ( HIT) increases the risk for thromboembolic events in ventricular assist device ( VAD) patients undergoing transplantation. However, cardiopulmonary bypass with alternative anticoagulants is often complicated by bleeding. Owing to this concern, we compared outcomes of HIT- positive versus control bridge- to- transplantation VAD patients; both groups were reexposed to heparin for cardiopulmonary bypass during transplant. Methods. From February 2000 to January 2006, data were reviewed on 92 consecutive adult patients who underwent VAD placement as a bridge to transplantation. Patients in whom thrombocytopenia developed after heparin exposure were tested for HIT with an enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay for antiheparin/ platelet factor- 4 ( HPF4) antibody ( GTI Diagnostics, Waukesha, Wisconsin). During VAD support, heparin was avoided in HIT- positive patients, but all patients were reexposed to heparin during transplantation. Comparisons between HIT- positive and control patients for survival and freedom from thromboembolic events were determined using the Kaplan- Meier method and logrank test. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank- sum and Student t test. Results. Twenty- four of the 92 patients ( 26.1%) were determined to be HIT positive by enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay. Survival to transplant was not different between the two groups. When compared with control patients, HIT- positive patients who were reexposed to heparin had a greater decrease in platelet counts immediately after transplant ( postoperative days 1 to 4, p < 0.05). Despite this transient thrombocytopenia, there was no difference in posttransplant mortality or thromboembolism. Conclusions. Heparin- induced thrombocytopenia - positive VAD patients did not experience increased thromboembolism or mortality after heparin reexposure. In light of the risks of using heparin alternatives, heparin reexposure is a safe management strategy for HIT- positive VAD patients.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 846
页数:6
相关论文