Behavioral approaches to the assessment of attention in animals

被引:128
作者
Bushnell, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Div Neurotoxicol, Natl Hlth & Environm Effects Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
attention; anima; assessment; behavioral procedure; cognitive process; validity;
D O I
10.1007/s002130050668
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Increasing awareness that disorders of attention may underlie cognitive dysfunctions associated with intoxication and neurodegenerative disease has stimulated research into the neural bases of attention. Because attention comprises a constellation of hypothetical cognitive processes, it can only be inferred from behavior, of either human or non-human subjects, under appropriate experimental conditions. Many behavioral procedures have been proposed for modeling attention in animals, but not all of these procedures have been systematically associated with specific attentional processes. This review endeavors to evaluate critically the construct validity of these procedures (i.e., to determine the degree io which a given procedure assesses a particular process) and to suggest experiments to improve the conceptual links between these procedures and the processes they purport to assess. Five categories of processes have been identified from the animal literature: orienting, expectancy, stimulus differentiation (including stimulus salience, discrimination of a critical stimulus from its context, and selection among stimuli), sustained attention, and parallel processing. The review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of specific behavioral procedures for assessing these categories of attentional processes and, given the conceptual uncertainties involved, it attempts to summarize the present state of knowledge of the pharmacology and neurobiology of attention.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 259
页数:29
相关论文
共 197 条
[71]   EFFECTS OF NALTREXONE, AND D-AMPHETAMINE, AND THEIR INTERACTION ON THE STIMULUS-CONTROL OF CHOICE BEHAVIOR OF RATS [J].
GRILLY, DM ;
GOWANS, GC .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 96 (01) :73-80
[72]   NEURAL ASSOCIATIONS OF THE SUBSTANTIA INNOMINATA IN THE RAT - AFFERENT CONNECTIONS [J].
GROVE, EA .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1988, 277 (03) :315-346
[73]   AGE-DIFFERENCES IN DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE - PROCEDURES, ASSUMPTIONS, AND RESULTS [J].
GUTTENTAG, RE .
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1989, 9 (02) :146-170
[74]   EXPECTANCY IN CHOICE REACTION TIME - ANTICIPATION OF STIMULUS OR RESPONSE [J].
HINRICHS, JV ;
KRAINZ, PL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 85 (03) :330-&
[75]  
HIRST W, 1985, MIND BAIN DIALOGUES, P105
[76]   AMYGDALA CENTRAL NUCLEUS LESIONS DISRUPT INCREMENTS, BUT NOT DECREMENTS, IN CONDITIONED-STIMULUS PROCESSING [J].
HOLLAND, PC ;
GALLAGHER, M .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 107 (02) :246-253
[77]   EFFECTS OF AMYGDALA CENTRAL NUCLEUS LESIONS ON BLOCKING AND UNBLOCKING [J].
HOLLAND, PC ;
GALLAGHER, M .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 107 (02) :235-245
[78]   CONDITIONED STIMULUS AS A DETERMINANT OF FORM OF PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONED-RESPONSE [J].
HOLLAND, PC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1977, 3 (01) :77-104
[79]   EXCITATION AND INHIBITION IN UNBLOCKING [J].
HOLLAND, PC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1988, 14 (03) :261-279
[80]   DISSOCIATION BETWEEN THE ATTENTIONAL EFFECTS OF INFUSIONS OF A BENZODIAZEPINE RECEPTOR AGONIST AND AN INVERSE AGONIST INTO THE BASAL FOREBRAIN [J].
HOLLEY, LA ;
TURCHI, J ;
APPLE, C ;
SARTER, M .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 120 (01) :99-108