Who Cares and Who Is Careless? Insufficient Effort Responding as a Reflection of Respondent Personality

被引:135
作者
Bowling, Nathan A. [1 ]
Huang, Jason L. [2 ]
Bragg, Caleb B. [3 ]
Khazon, Steve [1 ]
Liu, Mengqiao [1 ]
Blackmore, Caitlin E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wright State Univ, Dept Psychol, 303C Fawcett Hall,3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Sch Human Resources & Labor Relat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Cent Connecticut State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, New Britain, CT USA
关键词
insufficient effort responding; careless responding; response effort; behavioral consistency; personality; BEHAVIORAL CONSISTENCY; VALIDITY; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION; SITUATIONS; RESPONSES; STUDENTS; COLLEGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1037/pspp0000085
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys, which occurs when respondents fail to carefully read questionnaire instructions or item content, has recently gained attention as a source of inaccuracy in self-report data (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Maniaci & Rogge, 2014; Meade & Craig, 2012). Whereas previous studies have focused on IER as a methodological nuisance, the current studies examined IER as a substantive variable. Specifically, we hypothesized that IER is a reflection of enduring individual differences. In Study 1, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency over the course of 13 months; in Studies 2 and 3, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency across multiple research situations; in Study 4, we found that acquaintance-reported conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability were each negatively related to IER; and in Study 5, we found that IER was related to college grade point average and class absences. Together, these 5 studies suggest that IER is in part a manifestation of enduring individual differences.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 229
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条