Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation

被引:117
作者
Toubia, O
Simester, DI
Hauser, JR
Dahan, E
机构
[1] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
new product research; measurement; Internet marketing; estimation and other statistical techniques;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.22.3.273.17743
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
W e propose and test new adaptive question design and estimation algorithms for partial-profile conjoint analysis. Polyhedral question design focuses questions to reduce a feasible set of parameters as rapidly as possible. Analytic center estimation uses a centrality criterion based on consistency with respondents' answers. Both algorithms run with no noticeable delay between questions. We evaluate the proposed methods relative to established benchmarks for question design (random selection, D-efficient designs, adaptive conjoint analysis) and estimation (hierarchical Bayes). Monte Carlo simulations vary respondent heterogeneity and response errors. For low numbers of questions, polyhedral question design does best (or is tied for best) for all tested domains. For high numbers of questions, efficient fixed designs do better in some domains. Analytic center estimation shows promise for high heterogeneity and for low response errors; hierarchical Bayes for low heterogeneity and high response errors. Other simulations evaluate hybrid methods, which include self-explicated data. A field test (330 respondents) compared methods on both internal validity (holdout tasks) and external validity (actual choice of a laptop bag worth approximately $100). The field test is consistent with the simulation results and offers strong support for polyhedral question design. In addition, marketplace sales were consistent with conjoint-analysis predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 303
页数:31
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Allenby GM, 1999, J ECONOMETRICS, V89, P57
[2]   An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ainslie, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (04) :479-487
[3]   A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand [J].
Arora, N ;
Allenby, GM ;
Ginter, JL .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :29-44
[4]   Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments [J].
Arora, N ;
Huber, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (02) :273-283
[5]   DETERMINING INTERBRAND SUBSTITUTABILITY THROUGH SURVEY MEASUREMENT OF CONSUMER PREFERENCE STRUCTURES [J].
BUCKLIN, RE ;
SRINIVASAN, V .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (01) :58-71
[7]  
Dahan E, 2002, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V19, P332, DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00151-0
[8]   LINEAR-MODELS IN DECISION-MAKING [J].
DAWES, RM ;
CORRIGAN, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1974, 81 (02) :95-106
[9]   USE OF NONLINEAR, NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS AS A FUNCTION OF TASK AND AMOUNT OF INFORMATION [J].
EINHORN, HJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1971, 6 (01) :1-27
[10]   AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF RATINGS-BASED AND CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT MODELS [J].
ELROD, T ;
LOUVIERE, JJ ;
DAVEY, KS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (03) :368-377