Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference reversals owing to number size framing

被引:42
作者
Wong, KFE [1 ]
Kwong, JYY
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Management & Org, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
preference reversal; prospect theory; number size preference reversals; number size framing; framing effects;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.04.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Previous research has found that changes in irrelevant information, evaluation scales, or evaluation modes can lead to preference reversals. Drawing upon prospect theory, we introduced number size preference reversals, which occur under two conditions sharing identical information, evaluation mode, and evaluation scale. That is, for multiple options that have tradeoffs between attributes, an option is favored more when its superior attribute is framed with small numbers than when it is framed with large numbers. We tested the number size preference reversal in six experiments, demonstrating that it occurred in different background settings, remained stable when different evaluation scales were used, and was not contingent upon positive-negative attribute frames. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 65
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   Gain/loss asymmetry and riskless choice: Loss aversion in choices among job finalists [J].
Highhouse, S ;
Johnson, MA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 68 (03) :225-233
[12]   Context-dependent selection: The effects of decoy and phantom job candidates [J].
Highhouse, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 65 (01) :68-76
[13]   Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis [J].
Hsee, CK ;
Loewenstein, GF ;
Blount, S ;
Bazerman, MH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (05) :576-590
[14]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257
[15]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[16]   WILLINGNESS TO PAY AND COMPENSATION DEMANDED - EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE OF AN UNEXPECTED DISPARITY IN MEASURES OF VALUE [J].
KNETSCH, JL ;
SINDEN, JA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 99 (03) :507-521
[17]  
KNETSCH JL, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P1277
[18]   HOW CONSUMERS ARE AFFECTED BY THE FRAMING OF ATTRIBUTE INFORMATION BEFORE AND AFTER CONSUMING THE PRODUCT [J].
LEVIN, IP ;
GAETH, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (03) :374-378
[19]   All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects [J].
Levin, IP ;
Schneider, SL ;
Gaeth, GJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 76 (02) :149-188
[20]   REVERSALS OF PREFERENCE BETWEEN BIDS AND CHOICES IN GAMBLING DECISIONS [J].
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 89 (01) :46-+