Spinal cord planning risk volumes for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head-and-neck cancer

被引:14
作者
Breen, SL
Craig, T
Bayley, A
O'Sullivan, B
Kim, J
Jaffray, D
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Radiat Phys, Radiat Med Program,Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
planning risk volumes; spinal cord; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; head-and-neck cancer; oropharynx;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.038
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins of the spinal cord in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of oropharyngeal cancers, by modeling the effect of geometric uncertainties to estimate the probability of the spinal cord receiving a particular dose. Methods and Materials: Five patients with oropharyngeal cancer were treated by IMRT with simultaneous doses of 66 Gy (gross disease) and 54 Gy (subclinical disease) in 30 fractions. Spinal cord doses were limited to 45 Gy. The probability, due to random and systematic patient positioning uncertainties (3-mm standard deviation), of the cord receiving a particular dose was determined. The effect of an on-line setup correction protocol was also modeled. Results: The mean probability of a maximum spinal cord dose of 45 Gy was 1%, with a 6-mm PRV margin. The mean probability of a maximum dose exceeding 40 Gy was 37% (range, 13-77%); this probability is reduced with a setup correction protocol. Conclusion: A spinal cord PRV generated with a 6-mm margin leads to a 99% probability of maintaining the maximum spinal cord dose below 45 Gy. The application of an on-line setup correction protocol reduces the cord dose by approximately 5 Gy. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 325
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Bel, A ;
vanHerk, M ;
Lebesque, JV .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (09) :1537-1545
[2]   Considerations for the implementation of target volume protocols in radiation therapy [J].
Craig, T ;
Battista, J ;
Moiseenko, V ;
Van Dyk, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (01) :241-250
[3]   Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Ten Haken, RK ;
Kim, HM ;
Marsh, LH ;
Ship, JA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03) :577-587
[4]  
International Commission in Radiation Units and Measurements, 1999, 62 ICRU
[5]   IMPLEMENTATION OF RANDOM POSITIONING ERROR IN COMPUTERIZED RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF FRACTIONATION [J].
LEONG, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (03) :327-334
[6]   Computerized design of target margins for treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy [J].
Mageras, GS ;
Fuks, Z ;
Leibel, SA ;
Ling, CC ;
Zelefsky, MJ ;
Kooy, HM ;
van Herk, M ;
Kutcher, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (02) :437-445
[7]   The effect of setup uncertainty on normal tissue sparing with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer [J].
Manning, MA ;
Wu, QW ;
Cardinale, RM ;
Mohan, R ;
Lauve, AD ;
Kavanagh, BD ;
Morris, MM ;
Schmidt-Ullrich, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1400-1409
[8]   Margins for geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiotherapy [J].
McKenzie, A ;
van Herk, M ;
Mijnheer, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :299-307
[9]   The width of margins in radiotherapy treatment plans [J].
McKenzie, AL ;
van Herk, M ;
Mijnheer, B .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (11) :3331-3342
[10]   Systematic set-up errors for IMRT in the head and neck region: effect on dose distribution [J].
Samuelsson, A ;
Mercke, C ;
Johansson, KA .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (03) :303-311