Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory

被引:191
作者
Clayson, Peter E. [1 ]
Larson, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Psychol, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Neurosci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
N2; P3; Cognitive control; Conflict adaptation; Event-related potentials (ERPs); Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC); Higher-order effect; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; STIMULUS-RESPONSE CONFLICT; ERROR-RELATED NEGATIVITY; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; EVENT-RELATED FMRI; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; STROOP TASK; PREADOLESCENT CHILDREN; RELEVANT INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the cognitive control process of conflict adaptation and the recruitment of cognitive control across sequential trials-termed higher-order trial effects-using the N2 and P3 components of the scalp-recorded event-related potential (ERP). High-density ERPs were obtained from 181 healthy individuals (93 female, 88 male) during a modified Eriksen flanker task. Behavioral measures (i.e., error rates, reaction times [RTs]) and N2 and P3 amplitudes showed reliable conflict adaptation (i.e., previous-trial congruencies influenced current-trial measures). Higher-order trial effects were quantified across multiple sequential presentations of congruent or incongruent trials (e.g., four consecutive incongruent trials). For higher-order trial effects, P3 amplitudes and RTs reliably decreased across both congruent and incongruent trials. Consistent with the conflict monitoring theory, N2 amplitudes decreased across incongruent trials and increased across congruent trials. N2 amplitudes were positively correlated with incongruent-trial RTs; no significant correlations were found for P3 amplitudes and RTs. Effects remained when stimulus-response repetitions were removed. Results indicate that RTs and ERP measures are sensitive to modulations of cognitive control associated with conflict across multiple congruent and incongruent trials. Implications for the conflict monitoring theory of cognitive control are discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1953 / 1961
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[2]   Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update [J].
Botvinick, Matthew M. ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. ;
Carter, Cameron S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (12) :539-546
[3]   Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1172-1182
[4]   Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data [J].
Carter, Cameron S. ;
van Veen, Vincent .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 7 (04) :367-379
[5]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[6]   Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Botvinick, M ;
Carter, CS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :421-423
[7]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[8]   Anticipating Conflict Facilitates Controlled Stimulus-response Selection [J].
Correa, Angel ;
Rao, Anling ;
Nobre, Anna C. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 21 (08) :1461-1472
[9]   Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict [J].
Danielmeier, Claudia ;
Wessel, Jan R. ;
Steinhauser, Marco ;
Ullsperger, Markus .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 (06) :1288-1298
[10]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72