Relationship between different size classes of particulate matter and meteorology in three European cities

被引:52
作者
de Hartog, JJ
Hoek, G
Mirme, A
Tuch, T
Kos, GPA
ten Brink, HM
Brunekreef, B
Cyrys, J
Heinrich, J
Pitz, M
Lanki, T
Vallius, M
Pekkanen, J
Kreyling, WG
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Inst Risk Assessment Sci, Environm & Occupat Hlth Div, NL-3584 CK Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Tartu, Dept Environm Phys, Tartu, Estonia
[3] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Epidemiol, Neuherberg, Germany
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Inhalat Biol, Neuherberg, Germany
[5] Energy Res Ctr Netherlands, Petten, Netherlands
[6] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Environm Epidemiol Unit, Kuopio, Finland
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING | 2005年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1039/b415153d
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Evidence on the correlation between particle mass and (ultrafine) particle number concentrations is limited. Winter- and springtime measurements of urban background air pollution were performed in Amsterdam (The Netherlands), Erfurt (Germany) and Helsinki (Finland), within the framework of the EU funded ULTRA study. Daily average concentrations of ambient particulate matter with a 50% cut off of 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), total particle number concentrations and particle number concentrations in different size classes were collected at fixed monitoring sites. The aim of this paper is to assess differences in particle concentrations in several size classes across cities, the correlation between different particle fractions and to assess the differential impact of meteorological factors on their concentrations. The medians of ultrafine particle number concentrations were similar across the three cities (range 15.1 x 10(3)-18.3 x 10(3) counts cm(-3)). Within the ultrafine particle fraction, the sub fraction (10-30 nm) made a higher contribution to particle number concentrations in Erfurt than in Helsinki and Amsterdam. Larger differences across the cities were found for PM2.5 (range 11-17 mu g m(-3)). PM2.5 and ultrafine particle concentrations were weakly (Amsterdam, Helsinki) to moderately (Erfurt) correlated. The inconsistent correlation for PM2.5 and ultrafine particle concentrations between the three cities was partly explained by the larger impact of more local sources from the city on ultrafine particle concentrations than on PM2.5, suggesting that the upwind or downwind location of the measuring site in regard to potential particle sources has to be considered. Also, relationship with wind direction and meteorological data differed, suggesting that particle number and particle mass are two separate indicators of airborne particulate matter. Both decreased with increasing wind speed, but ultrafine particle number counts consistently decreased with increasing relative humidity, whereas PM2.5 increased with increasing barometric pressure. Within the ultrafine particle mode, nucleation mode (10-30 nm) and Aitken mode (30-100 nm) had distinctly different relationships with accumulation mode particles and weather conditions. Since the composition of these particle fractions also differs, it is of interest to test in future epidemiological studies whether they have different health effects.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 310
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Change of the ambient particle size distribution in East Germany between 1993 and 1999 [J].
Pitz, M ;
Kreyling, WG ;
Hölscher, B ;
Cyrys, J ;
Wichmann, HE ;
Heinrich, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (25) :4357-4366
[22]   Concentrations of ultrafine, fine and PM2.5 particles in three European cities [J].
Ruuskanen, J ;
Tuch, T ;
Ten Brink, H ;
Peters, A ;
Khlystov, A ;
Mirme, A ;
Kos, GPA ;
Brunekreef, B ;
Wichmann, HE ;
Buzorius, G ;
Vallius, M ;
Kreyling, WG ;
Pekkanen, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (21) :3729-3738
[23]   Measurements of ultrafine particle concentration and size distribution in the urban atmosphere [J].
Shi, JP ;
Khan, AA ;
Harrison, RM .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 235 (1-3) :51-64
[24]   Electrical aerosol spectrometer of Tartu University [J].
Tammet, H ;
Mirme, A ;
Tamm, E .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2002, 62 (3-4) :315-324
[25]   Comparison of two particle-size spectrometers for ambient aerosol measurements [J].
Tuch, T ;
Mirme, A ;
Tamm, E ;
Heinrich, J ;
Heyder, J ;
Brand, P ;
Roth, C ;
Wichmann, HE ;
Pekkanen, J ;
Kreyling, WG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (01) :139-149
[26]   Variation of particle number and mass concentration in various size ranges of ambient aerosols in Eastern Germany [J].
Tuch, T ;
Brand, P ;
Wichmann, HE ;
Heyder, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (24) :4193-4197
[27]   Long-term measurements of size-segregated ambient aerosol in two German cities located 100km apart [J].
Tuch, TM ;
Wehner, B ;
Pitz, M ;
Cyrys, J ;
Heinrich, J ;
Kreyling, WG ;
Wichmann, HE ;
Wiedensohler, A .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (33) :4687-4700
[28]   Street level versus rooftop concentrations of submicron aerosol particles and gaseous pollutants in an urban street canyon [J].
Väkevä, M ;
Hämeri, K ;
Kulmala, M ;
Lahdes, R ;
Ruuskanen, J ;
Laitinen, T .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (09) :1385-1397
[29]   Characterization of particulate air pollution in urban and non-urban areas in the Netherlands [J].
Van der Zee, SC ;
Hoek, G ;
Harssema, H ;
Brunekreef, B .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (21) :3717-3729
[30]   A European aerosol phenomenology-1:: physical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe [J].
Van Dingenen, R ;
Raes, F ;
Putaud, JP ;
Baltensperger, U ;
Charron, A ;
Facchini, MC ;
Decesari, S ;
Fuzzi, S ;
Gehrig, R ;
Hansson, HC ;
Harrison, RM ;
Hüglin, C ;
Jones, AM ;
Laj, P ;
Lorbeer, G ;
Maenhaut, W ;
Palmgren, F ;
Querol, X ;
Rodriguez, S ;
Schneider, J ;
ten Brink, H ;
Tunved, P ;
Torseth, K ;
Wehner, B ;
Weingartner, E ;
Wiedensohler, A ;
Wåhlin, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 38 (16) :2561-2577