Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography - Meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data

被引:399
作者
Berghella, V
Odibo, AO
To, MS
Rust, OA
Althuisius, SM
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, London SE1 9RT, England
[5] Lehigh Valley Hosp & Hlth Network, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Depobs, Allentown, PA USA
[6] Leeds Gen Infirom, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Belmont, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000168435.17200.53
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Preterm birth is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography predicts preterm birth. Our aim was to estimate by meta-analysis of randomized trials whether cerclage prevents preterm birth in women with a short cervical length. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched with the terms "cerclage," "cervical cerclage," "short cervix," "ultrasound," and "randomized trial." We included randomized trials involving the use of cerclage in women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography using patient-level data. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Four properly conducted trials were identified. In the total population, preterm birth at less than 35 weeks of gestation occurred in 29.2% (89/305) of the cerclage group, compared with 34.8% (105/302) of the no-cerclage groups (relative risk [RR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.06). There was no significant heterogeneity in the overall analysis (P=.29). There was a significant reduction in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in the cerclage group compared with the no-cerclage groups in singleton gestations (RR 0.74, 95% Cl 0.57-0.96), singleton gestations with prior preterm birth (RR 0.61, 95% Cl 0.40-0.92), and singleton gestations with prior second-trimester loss (RR 0,57, 95% Cl 0.33-0.99). There was a significant increase in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in twin gestations (RR 2.15, 95% Cl 1.15-4.01). Conclusion: Cerclage does not prevent preterm birth in all women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography. In the subgroup analysis of singleton gestations with short cervical length, especially those with a prior preterm birth, cerclage may reduce preterm birth, and a well-powered trial should be carried out in this group of patients. In contrast, in twins, cerclage was associated with a significantly higher incidence of preterm birth.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Afra D, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1011
[2]   Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone [J].
Althuisius, SM ;
Dekker, GA ;
Hummel, P ;
Bekedam, DJ ;
van Geijn, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) :1106-1112
[3]   Effectiveness of cervical cerclage for a sonographically shortened cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Belej-Rak, T ;
Okun, N ;
Windrim, R ;
Ross, S ;
Hannah, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) :1679-1687
[4]   Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in patients with high-risk pregnancies: Does cerclage prevent prematurity? [J].
Berghella, V ;
Daly, SF ;
Tolosa, JE ;
DiVito, MM ;
Chalmers, R ;
Garg, N ;
Bhullar, A ;
Wapner, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (04) :809-815
[5]   Cerclage for prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: A randomized trial [J].
Berghella, V ;
Odibo, AO ;
Tolosa, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) :1311-1317
[6]   Frequency of uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scan [J].
Berghella, V ;
Iams, JD ;
Newman, RB ;
MacPherson, C ;
Goldenberg, RL ;
Mueller-Heubach, E ;
Caritis, SN ;
Dombrowski, MP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) :1253-1256
[7]   CERVICAL INTERNAL OS CERCLAGE - DESCRIPTION OF A NEW TECHNIQUE AND COMPARISON WITH SHIRODKAR OPERATION [J].
CASPI, E ;
SCHNEIDER, DF ;
MOR, Z ;
LANGER, R ;
WEINRAUB, Z ;
BUKOVSKY, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1990, 7 (04) :347-349
[8]   ELECTIVE CERVICAL SUTURE OF TWIN PREGNANCIES DIAGNOSED ULTRASONICALLY IN THE 1ST TRIMESTER FOLLOWING INDUCED OVULATION [J].
DOR, J ;
SHALEV, J ;
MASHIACH, S ;
BLANKSTEIN, J ;
SERR, DM .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1982, 13 (01) :55-60
[9]   Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: Meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Drakeley, AJ ;
Roberts, D ;
Alfirevic, Z .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (03) :621-627
[10]   How should randomised trials including multiple pregnancies be analysed? [J].
Gates, S ;
Brocklehurst, P .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (03) :213-219