The role of forecasting on bullwhip effect for E-SCM applications

被引:77
作者
Bayraktar, Erkan [2 ]
Koh, S. C. Lenny [1 ]
Gunasekaran, A. [3 ]
Sari, Kazim [4 ]
Tatoglu, Ekrem [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Management, Sheffield S1 4DT, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Bahcesehir Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] SE Massachusetts Univ, Dept Management, N Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
[4] Beykent Univ, Dept Int Logist & Transportat, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Bahcesehir Univ, Fac Business Adm, Dept Business Adm, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
bullwhip effect; forecasting; exponential smoothing; E-SCM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.03.024
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The bullwhip effect represents the information distortion in customer demand between orders to supplier and sales to the buyer. Demand forecasting is one of the main causes of the bullwhip effect. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of exponential smoothing forecasts on the bullwhip effect for electronic supply chain management (E-SCM) applications. A simulation model is developed to experiment the different scenarios of selecting right parameters for the exponential smoothing forecasting technique. It is found that longer lead times and poor selection of forecasting model parameters lead to strong bullwhip effect in E-SCM. In contrast, increased seasonality helps to reduce the bullwhip effect. The most significant managerial implication of this study lies in the need to reduce lead times along the E-supply chain to mitigate the bullwhip effect. While high seasonality would reduce the forecast accuracy, it has a positive influence on the reduction of bullwhip effect. E-SCM managers are therefore strongly suggested to utilize exponential smoothing by selecting lower values for alpha and beta and a mid-value for gamma to keep the bullwhip ratio low, while at the same time to increase forecast accuracy. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 204
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   Layers and mechanisms: A new taxonomy for the Bullwhip Effect [J].
Miragliotta, Giovanni .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 104 (02) :365-381
[32]  
Moberg C.R., 2002, INT J PHYS DISTRIBUT, V32, P755
[33]  
Power D.J., 2001, INT J PHYS DISTRIB, V31, P247, DOI DOI 10.1108/09600030110394923
[34]  
Simchi-Levi D., 2003, Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies, and case studies
[35]  
Sink H. L., 1996, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V26, P38, DOI 10.1108/09600039610115009
[36]   MODELING MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR - MISPERCEPTIONS OF FEEDBACK IN A DYNAMIC DECISION-MAKING EXPERIMENT [J].
STERMAN, JD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (03) :321-339
[37]   Models for supply chains in e-business [J].
Swaminathan, JM ;
Tayur, SR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (10) :1387-1406
[38]   The seamless supply chain - The predator's strategic advantage [J].
Towill, DR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (01) :37-56
[39]   Multi-agent framework for third party logistics in E-commerce [J].
Ying, W ;
Sang, DY .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2005, 29 (02) :431-436
[40]   The impact of forecasting methods on the bullwhip effect [J].
Zhang, XL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (01) :15-27