Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension

被引:438
作者
Novick, JM [1 ]
Trueswell, JC [1 ]
Thompson-Schill, SL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A century of investigation into the role of the human frontal lobes in complex cognition, including language processing, has revealed several interesting but apparently contradictory findings. In particular, the results of numerous studies suggest that left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), which includes Broca's area, plays a direct role in sentence-level syntactic processing. In contrast, other brain-imaging and neuropsychological data indicate that LIFG is crucial for cognitive control-specifically, for overriding highly regularized, automatic processes, even when a task involves syntactically undemanding material (e.g., single words, a list of letters). We provide a unifying account of these findings, which emphasizes the importance of general cognitive control mechanisms for the syntactic processing of sentences. On the basis of a review of the neurocognitive and sentence-processing literatures, we defend the following three hypotheses: (1) LIFG is part of a network of frontal lobe subsystems that are generally responsible for the detection and resolution of incompatible stimulus representations; (2) the role of LIFG in sentence comprehension is to implement reanalysis in the face of misinterpretation; and (3) individual differences in cognitive control abilities in nonsyntactic tasks predict correlated variation in sentence-processing abilities pertaining to the recovery from misinterpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 281
页数:19
相关论文
共 108 条
[31]   Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis [J].
Ferreira, F ;
Christianson, K ;
Hollingworth, A .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2001, 30 (01) :3-20
[32]   Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers [J].
Fiebach, CJ ;
Vos, SH ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (09) :1562-1575
[33]   Brain activity during memory retrieval - The influence of imagery and semantic cueing [J].
Fletcher, PC ;
Shallice, T ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Dolan, RJ .
BRAIN, 1996, 119 :1587-1596
[34]   Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: Inhibition, error detection, and correction [J].
Garavan, H ;
Ross, TJ ;
Murphy, K ;
Roche, RAP ;
Stein, EA .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (04) :1820-1829
[35]   The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences [J].
Garnsey, SM ;
Pearlmutter, NJ ;
Myers, E ;
Lotocky, MA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1997, 37 (01) :58-93
[36]   Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring [J].
Gehring, WJ ;
Knight, RT .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :516-520
[37]   READING SKILL AND SUPPRESSION REVISITED [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA ;
ROBERTSON, RRW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (03) :165-169
[38]   LESS SKILLED READERS HAVE LESS EFFICIENT SUPPRESSION MECHANISMS [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (05) :294-298
[39]   Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies [J].
Gibson, E .
COGNITION, 1998, 68 (01) :1-76
[40]   The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area [J].
Grodzinsky, Y .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2000, 23 (01) :1-+