Global distribution and climate forcing of marine organic aerosol: 1. Model improvements and evaluation

被引:71
作者
Meskhidze, N. [1 ]
Xu, J. [1 ,2 ]
Gantt, B. [1 ]
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
Nenes, A. [3 ,4 ]
Ghan, S. J. [5 ]
Liu, X. [5 ]
Easter, R. [5 ]
Zaveri, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Marine Earth & Atmospher Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Atmospher Sci & Global Change Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
CLOUD DROPLET FORMATION; SEA-SPRAY AEROSOL; SULFUR CYCLE; DIMETHYLSULFIDE DMS; NATIONAL CENTER; BOUNDARY-LAYER; SALT AEROSOL; PARAMETERIZATION; PARTICLES; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.5194/acp-11-11689-2011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Marine organic aerosol emissions have been implemented and evaluated within the National Center of Atmospheric Research (NCAR)'s Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's 7-mode Modal Aerosol Module (MAM-7). Emissions of marine primary organic aerosols (POA), phytoplankton-produced isoprene- and monoterpenes-derived secondary organic aerosols (SOA) and methane sulfonate (MS-) are shown to affect surface concentrations of organic aerosols in remote marine regions. Global emissions of submicron marine POA is estimated to be 7.9 and 9.4 Tgyr(-1), for the Gantt et al. (2011) and Vignati et al. (2010) emission parameterizations, respectively. Marine sources of SOA and particulate MS- (containing both sulfur and carbon atoms) contribute an additional 0.2 and 5.1 Tgyr(-1), respectively. Widespread areas over productive waters of the Northern Atlantic, Northern Pacific, and the Southern Ocean show marine-source submicron organic aerosol surface concentrations of 100 ng m(-3), with values up to 400 ng m(-3) over biologically productive areas. Comparison of long-term surface observations of water insoluble organic matter (WIOM) with POA concentrations from the two emission parameterizations shows that despite revealed discrepancies (often more than a factor of 2), both Gantt et al. (2011) and Vignati et al. (2010) formulations are able to capture the magnitude of marine organic aerosol concentrations, with the Gantt et al. (2011) parameterization attaining better seasonality. Model simulations show that the mixing state of the marine POA can impact the surface number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). The largest increases (up to 20 %) in CCN (at a supersaturation (S) of 0.2 %) number concentration are obtained over biologically productive ocean waters when marine organic aerosol is assumed to be externally mixed with sea-salt. Assuming marine organics are internally-mixed with sea-salt provides diverse results with increases and decreases in the concentration of CCN over different parts of the ocean. The sign of the CCN change due to the addition of marine organics to sea-salt aerosol is determined by the relative significance of the increase in mean modal diameter due to addition of mass, and the decrease in particle hygroscopicity due to compositional changes in marine aerosol. Based on emerging evidence for increased CCN concentration over biologically active surface ocean areas/periods, our study suggests that treatment of sea spray in global climate models (GCMs) as an internal mixture of marine organic aerosols and sea-salt will likely lead to an underestimation in CCN number concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:11689 / 11705
页数:17
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [1] A parameterization of aerosol activation - 1. Single aerosol type
    Abdul-Razzak, H
    Ghan, SJ
    Rivera-Carpio, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D6) : 6123 - 6131
  • [2] A parameterization of aerosol activation 2. Multiple aerosol types
    Abdul-Razzak, H
    Ghan, SJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D5) : 6837 - 6844
  • [3] Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols
    Andreae, M. O.
    Rosenfeld, D.
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2008, 89 (1-2) : 13 - 41
  • [4] Aerosols before pollution
    Andreae, Meinrat O.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5808) : 50 - 51
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS
  • [7] Evaluation of the global oceanic isoprene source and its impacts on marine organic carbon aerosol
    Arnold, S. R.
    Spracklen, D. V.
    Williams, J.
    Yassaa, N.
    Sciare, J.
    Bonsang, B.
    Gros, V.
    Peeken, I.
    Lewis, A. C.
    Alvain, S.
    Moulin, C.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (04) : 1253 - 1262
  • [8] Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations
    Barahona, D.
    West, R. E. L.
    Stier, P.
    Romakkaniemi, S.
    Kokkola, H.
    Nenes, A.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (05) : 2467 - 2473
  • [9] Dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl sulfoxide and their oxidation in the atmosphere
    Barnes, I
    Hjorth, J
    Mihalopoulos, N
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2006, 106 (03) : 940 - 975
  • [10] Sulfur chemistry in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: Description, evaluation, features, and sensitivity to aqueous chemistry
    Barth, MC
    Rasch, PJ
    Kiehl, JT
    Benkovitz, CM
    Schwartz, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D1) : 1387 - 1415