Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation

被引:50
作者
Journée, HL [1 ]
Polak, HE
de Kleuver, M
Langeloo, DD
Postma, AA
机构
[1] St Maartens Clin, Dept Orthopaed, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] St Maartens Clin, Dept Anaesthesiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
double-train stimulation; preconditioning; transcranial stimulation; motor evoked potentials; TES; inter-stimulus interval;
D O I
10.1007/BF02351019
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 [计算机应用技术]; 0835 [软件工程];
摘要
Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) have become an important technique for monitoring spinal cord function intra-operatively, but can fail in some patients. A new technique of double-train stimulation is described. A multipulse transcranial electrical stimulus is preceded by a preconditioning pulse train that leads to larger MEP responses. An MEP monitoring system was adapted for double-train transcranial stimulation (DTS). MEP responses from 160 anterior tibial muscles obtained by double-train stimulation were analysed. All patients received propofol/remifentanil/O-2/N2O anaesthesia. Fifty-two (83%) out of 63 single-train tibial MEPs with response amplitudes below 100 muV were magnified to over 100 muV, with an inter-train (inter-stimulus) interval ITI = 10-35 ms. These 63 amplitudes were magnified by an overall logarithmic mean factor of 15.5. For 97 MEPs with amplitudes above 100 muV, the logarithmic mean facilitation factor was 2.4. It was concluded that double-train TES stimulation can markedly facilitate responses to a single stimulus train (STS). The facilitation appears to be most effective when the responses to STS would otherwise be small or absent. This preconditioning stimulation technique is therefore useful when an STS leads to responses that are too small for effective monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 113
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Cortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease - A study with paired magnetic stimulation [J].
Berardelli, A ;
Rona, S ;
Inghilleri, M ;
Manfredi, M .
BRAIN, 1996, 119 :71-77
[2]
The effects of a volatile anaesthetic on the excitability of human corticospinal axons [J].
Burke, D ;
Bartley, K ;
Woodforth, IJ ;
Yakoubi, A ;
Stephen, JPH .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :992-1000
[3]
Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction [J].
Calancie, B ;
Harris, W ;
Brindle, GF ;
Green, BA ;
Landy, HJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 95 (02) :161-168
[4]
Cruccu G, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P418, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199704)20:4<418::AID-MUS3>3.0.CO
[5]
2-D
[6]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation [J].
Currà, A ;
Modugno, N ;
Inghilleri, M ;
Manfredi, M ;
Hallett, M ;
Berardelli, A .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (12) :1851-1859
[7]
Efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked myogenic potentials to detect spinal cord ischemia during operations for thoracoabdominal aneurysms [J].
deHaan, P ;
Kalkman, CJ ;
deMol, BA ;
Ubags, LH ;
Veldman, DJ ;
Jacobs, MJHM .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (01) :87-100
[8]
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor evoked potentials in anesthetized humans. Part 1. Recovery time of corticospinal tract direct waves elicited by pairs of transcranial electrical stimuli [J].
Deletis, V ;
Isgum, V ;
Amassian, VE .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (03) :438-444
[9]
INTERHEMISPHERIC INHIBITION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX [J].
FERBERT, A ;
PRIORI, A ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
DAY, BL ;
COLEBATCH, JG ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1992, 453 :525-546
[10]
Jones SJ, 1996, EVOKED POTENTIAL, V100, P375