Analysis of 140 pesticides from conventional farming foodstuff samples after extraction with the modified QuECheRS method

被引:176
作者
Lesueur, C. [1 ,2 ]
Knittl, P. [2 ]
Gartner, M. [2 ]
Mentler, A. [3 ]
Fuerhacker, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Inst Sanit Engn & Water Pollut Control, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Gartner & LVA GmbH, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[3] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Inst Soil Res, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
gas chromatography; liquid chromatography; mass spectrometry; pesticide residues; foodstuff;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.09.002
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Pesticides in foodstuff are becoming a major issue due to their intensive use in agriculture. Thus an appropriate control of their residues in food samples has to be operated. In this study we analysed 105 pesticides with GC/SQ-MS and 46 pesticides with HPLC/IT-MS after extraction with the QuECheRS method in four matrices (grape, lemon, onion and tomatoes). For GC-amenable substances, the LOD and LOQ ranged from 0.4 to 48.2 mu g/kg and from 1.2 to 161 mu g/kg, respectively. For HPLC-amenable substances, they varied from 1.0 to 115 mu g/kg and from 3.3 to 382 mu g/kg, respectively. With GC/MS, 61-82% of the substances showed a recovery in the range of 701 110% and 6-30% presented a recovery higher than 110% at the 500 mu g/kg fortification level. With HPLC/MS, 87-93%, of the substances presented recoveries in the range of 70-110% at the 500 mu g/kg fortification level compared to 78-85% at the 50 mu g/kg fortification level. Lemon and onion showed poor recoveries but are known to be difficult matrices (high acidic and high sulfur content, respectively). The method was proved to be repeatable with RSD lower than 20% at 500 mu g/kg and lower than 15% at 50 mu g/kg with both devices. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 914
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Anastassiades M, 2003, J AOAC INT, V86, P412
[2]   Analysis of pesticides in fruits by pressurized liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-ion trap-triple stage mass spectrometry [J].
Blasco, C ;
Font, G ;
Picó, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1098 (1-2) :37-43
[3]   Multiple-stage mass spectrometric analysis of six pesticides in oranges by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry [J].
Blasco, C ;
Font, G ;
Picó, Y .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1043 (02) :231-238
[4]  
*CEN TC, 2006, 275 CEN TC
[5]  
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), 1999, S19 DFG
[6]  
*DFG, 2002, 704 DFG
[7]   Comparison of an acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" method with classical multi-residue methods for the extraction of herbicide residues in barley samples [J].
Diez, C. ;
Traag, W. A. ;
Zommer, P. ;
Marinero, P. ;
Atienza, J. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1131 (1-2) :11-23
[8]  
*DIN, 1998, 12393 DIN EN
[9]   Monitoring multi-class pesticide residues in fresh fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Frenich, AG ;
Vidal, JLM ;
López, TL ;
Aguado, SC ;
Salvador, IM .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1048 (02) :199-206
[10]   Multiresidue liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry determination of 52 non gas chromatography-amenable pesticides and metabolites in different food commodities [J].
Hernández, F ;
Pozo, OJ ;
Sancho, JV ;
Bijlsma, L ;
Barreda, A ;
Pitarch, E .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1109 (02) :242-252