Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics:: Dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom® 9000 DVT

被引:30
作者
Coppenrath, E. [1 ]
Draenert, F.
Lechel, U. [2 ]
Veit, R. [2 ]
Meindl, T. [1 ]
Reiser, M. [1 ]
Mueller-Lisse, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Klin Radiol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Bundesamt Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2008年 / 180卷 / 05期
关键词
head/neck; CT; radiation safety;
D O I
10.1055/s-2008-1027142
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: For nonsuperimposed and three-dimensional imaging of jaws and teeth, multislice computer tomography (MSCT) can be performed, or alternatively digital volume tomography as a cone beam technique can be applied. The radiation dose of both procedures should be evaluated with different methods of dose assessment. Materials and Methods: A4-row MSCT (Volume Zoom Siemens(R)) and a cone beam CT (NewTom QR-DVT 9000(R)) were compared regarding the radiation exposure of the patient during a dental examination. Organ dose and effective dose were estimated by thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD) using an Alderson-Rando phantom for both devices. In addition the effective dose of MSCT was calculated from the CTDIvol-value at scanner display and by CT-Expo(R) program. Results: The effective dose of MSCT was 0.33 mSv for women (w) and 0.32 mSv for men (m) measured with TLD in the Alderson-Rando phantom, 0.39/0.35 mSv (w/m) by CTDI calculation and 0.39/0.33 mSv by CT-Expo(R) program. The effective dose of NewTom(R) QR-DVT 9000 from TLD measurement was 0.095/0.093 mSv (w/m). Conclusion: The radiation exposure of a typical dental examination with a NewTom(R) cone beam DVT is about one third of the MSCT dose. Both techniques, however, moderate patient doses. Dosimetry methods as routinely used for MSCT cannot be applied to cone beam DVT.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 401
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Brix G, 2005, RADIOLOGE, V45, P340, DOI 10.1007/s00117-005-1184-3
[2]
Assessment of a theoretical formalism for dose estimation in CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study [J].
Brix, G ;
Lechel, U ;
Veit, R ;
Truckenbrodt, R ;
Stamm, G ;
Coppenrath, EM ;
Griebel, J ;
Nagel, HD .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (07) :1275-1284
[3]
*BUND STRAHL, 2003, BUNDESANZEIGER, P17503
[4]
Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[5]
Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom® cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT [J].
Draenert, F. G. ;
Coppenrath, E. ;
Herzog, P. ;
Muller, S. ;
Mueller-Lisse, U. G. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (04) :198-203
[6]
*EUR COMM, 1999, 16262 EUR EN EUR COM, P69
[7]
Influence of grid control and object detection on radiation exposure and image quality using mobile C-arms-first results [J].
Gosch, D. ;
Ratzmer, A. ;
Berauer, P. ;
Kahn, T. .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (09) :896-900
[8]
Radiation exposure with 3D rotational angiography of the skull [J].
Gosch, D. ;
Kurze, W. ;
Deckert, F. ;
Schulz, T. ;
Patz, A. ;
Kahn, T. .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2006, 178 (09) :880-885
[9]
Awareness of radiation exposure of thoracic CT scans and conventional radiographs: What do non-radiologists know? [J].
Heyer, C. M. ;
Peters, S. ;
Lemburg, S. ;
Nicolas, V. .
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (03) :261-267
[10]
Calculated organ doses and effective dosage for CT examination of the thorax and abdomen: Are these doses realistic? [J].
Hidajat, N ;
Vogl, T ;
Schroder, RJ ;
Felix, R .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1996, 164 (05) :382-387