EPI-BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth

被引:59
作者
Fera, F
Yongbi, MN
van Gelderen, P
Frank, JA
Mattay, VS
Duyn, JH
机构
[1] NINDS, Lab Funct & Mol Imaging, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NIMH, Clin Brain Disorder Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] CNR, Inst Expt Med & Biotechnol, Cosenza, Italy
[4] NIH, Lab Diagnost Radiol Res, Ctr Clin, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
BOLD; fMRI; brain; optimization; EPI;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.10440
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the sensitivity dependence of BOLD functional imaging on MRI acquisition parameters in motor stimulation experiments using a finger tapping paradigm. Materials and Methods: Gradient-echo echo-planar fMRI experiments were performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with varying acquisition echo time and bandwidth, and with a 4 mm isotropic voxel size. To analyze the BOLD sensitivity, the relative contributions of BOLD signal amplitude and thermal and physiologic noise sources were evaluated, and statistical t-scores were compared in the motor area. Results: At 1.5 T, the number of activated pixels and the average t-score showed a relatively broad optimum over a TE range of 60-160 msec. At 3.0 T, an optimum range was observed between TEs of 30-130 msec. Averaged over nine subjects, maxima in the number of pixels and t-score values were 59% and 18% higher at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T, respectively, an improvement that was lower than the observed 100% to 110% increase in signal-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T. Conclusion: The somewhat disappointing increase in t-scores at 3.0 T was attributed to the increased contribution of physiologic noise at the higher field strength under the given experimental conditions. At both field strengths, reducing the effective image acquisition bandwidth from 35 to 17 Hz per pixel did not affect or only marginally affect the BOLD sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Krüger, G ;
Glover, GH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (04) :631-637
[12]   Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal [J].
Logothetis, NK ;
Pauls, J ;
Augath, M ;
Trinath, T ;
Oeltermann, A .
NATURE, 2001, 412 (6843) :150-157
[13]   TESLA GRADIENT RECALLED ECHO CHARACTERISTICS OF PHOTIC STIMULATION-INDUCED SIGNAL CHANGES IN THE HUMAN PRIMARY VISUAL-CORTEX [J].
MENON, RS ;
OGAWA, S ;
TANK, DW ;
UGURBIL, K .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (03) :380-386
[14]  
Menon RS, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P230, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199902)41:2<230::AID-MRM3>3.0.CO
[15]  
2-O
[16]   ANATOMIC RELATIONSHIPS ALONG THE LOW-MIDDLE CONVEXITY .1. NORMAL SPECIMENS AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
NAIDICH, TP ;
VALAVANIS, AG ;
KUBIK, S .
NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 36 (03) :517-532
[17]   BRAIN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING WITH CONTRAST DEPENDENT ON BLOOD OXYGENATION [J].
OGAWA, S ;
LEE, TM ;
KAY, AR ;
TANK, DW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (24) :9868-9872
[18]  
PFEUFFER J, 2001, P INT SOC MAGN RESON, V9, P1257
[19]  
Posse S, 1999, MAGN RESON MED, V42, P87, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199907)42:1<87::AID-MRM13>3.0.CO
[20]  
2-O