Diagnostic usefulness of a T-cell-based assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis

被引:96
作者
Kim, Sung-Han
Choi, Su Jin
Kim, Hong-Bin
Kim, Nam-Joong
Oh, Myoung-don
Choe, Kang-Won
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Seoul 110744, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Clin Res Inst, Seoul 110744, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.20.2255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (E-TB) remains a challenge. A recently developed Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific region of difference 1 gene-based assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection showed promising results. However, the diagnostic usefulness of this assay remains to be determined compared with tuberculin skin test (TST) in patients with suspected E-TB in clinical practice. Methods: All patients with suspected E-TB were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary care hospital during a 9-month period. In addition to the conventional tests for diagnosing E-TB, the interferon gamma-producing T-cell responses to early secreted antigenic target 6 and culture filtrate protein 10 by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay were performed. Final diagnosis in patients having suspected E-TB was classified by clinical category. Results: Seventy-two patients with suspected E-TB were enrolled; 34 (47%) had immunosuppressive conditions. Of 72 patients, 32 (44%) were classified as having E-TB, including 22 with confirmed tuberculosis and 10 with probable tuberculosis, and 35 (49%) were classified as not having tuberculosis. The remaining 5 (7%) had possible tuberculosis and were excluded from the final analysis. Chronic caseating granulomas, acid-fast bacilli stain, M tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction, and cultures for M tuberculosis were positive in 22 (69%), 5 (16%), 15 (47%), and 18 (56%), respectively, of 32 patients with E-TB. The sensitivity and specificity of the TST (induration size, >= 10 mm) were 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-65%) and 86% (95% CI, 70%-95%), respectively. By comparison, the sensitivity and specificity of the ELISPOT assay were 94% (95% CI, 79%99%; P < .001 between TST and ELISPOT) and 88% (95% CI, 72%-97%; P=.99 between TST and ELISPOT), respectively. Conclusion: The ELISPOT assay is a useful adjunct test for diagnosing E-TB.
引用
收藏
页码:2255 / 2259
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P397
[2]   EXTRAPULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS REVISITED - A REVIEW OF EXPERIENCE AT BOSTON-CITY AND OTHER HOSPITALS [J].
ALVAREZ, S ;
MCCABE, WR .
MEDICINE, 1984, 63 (01) :25-55
[3]   The diagnosis of tuberculosis [J].
Brodie, D ;
Schluger, NW .
CLINICS IN CHEST MEDICINE, 2005, 26 (02) :247-+
[4]   Low sensitivity of a whole-blood interferon-γ release assay for detection of active tuberculosis [J].
Dewan, Puneet K. ;
Grinsdale, Jennifer ;
Kawamura, L. Masae .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 44 (01) :69-73
[5]   Performance of a T-cell-based diagnostic test for tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected individuals is independent of CD4 cell count [J].
Dheda, K ;
Lalvani, A ;
Miller, RF ;
Scott, G ;
Booth, H ;
Johnson, MA ;
Zumla, A ;
Rook, GAW .
AIDS, 2005, 19 (17) :2038-2041
[6]  
Fain, 2000, Eur J Intern Med, V11, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0953-6205(00)00076-5
[7]   Use in routine clinical practice of two commercial blood tests for diagnosis of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis:: a prospective study [J].
Ferrara, G ;
Losi, M ;
D'Amico, R ;
Roversi, P ;
Piro, R ;
Meacci, M ;
Meccugni, B ;
Dori, IM ;
Andreani, A ;
Bergamini, BM ;
Mussini, C ;
Rumpianesi, F ;
Fabbri, LM ;
Richeldi, L .
LANCET, 2006, 367 (9519) :1328-1334
[8]  
Hong YP, 1998, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V2, P27
[9]   THE TUBERCULIN SKIN-TEST [J].
HUEBNER, RE ;
SCHEIN, MF ;
BASS, JB .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 17 (06) :968-975
[10]   Discrepancy between the tuberculin skin test and the whole-blood interferon γ assay for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country [J].
Kang, YA ;
Lee, HW ;
Yoon, HI ;
Cho, BL ;
Han, SK ;
Shim, YS ;
Yim, JJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (22) :2756-2761