The costs and benefits of refuge requirements: The case of Bt cotton

被引:11
作者
Frisvold, George B. [1 ]
Reeves, Jeanne M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Cotton Inc, Agr Res Dept, Cary, NC USA
关键词
resistance management; refuges; technology adoption; Bt cotton;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Refuge requirements have been the primary regulatory tool to delay pest resistance to Bt crops. This paper presents a simple method to estimate the annual cost of refuges to producers, applying it to Bt cotton. It also examines broader welfare impacts, estimating how Bt cotton acreage restrictions affect producer surplus, consumer surplus, seed supplier profits, and commodity program outlays. The implications of grower adoption behavior - partial adoption, aggregate adoption, and refuge choice - for regulatory costs are examined. Empirical examples illustrate how providing multiple refuge options significantly reduces regulatory costs. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
FRISVOLD G, 2004, P BELTW COTT C, P555
[22]  
Frisvold G. B., 2006, International trade and policies for genetically modified products, P191, DOI 10.1079/9780851990569.0191
[23]  
Gustafson DI, 2006, J ECON ENTOMOL, V99, P2116, DOI 10.1603/0022-0493-99.6.2116
[24]  
Huang JK, 2002, AUST J AGR RESOUR EC, V46, P367, DOI [10.1111/1467-8489.00184, 10.1079/9780851996189.0393]
[25]   Plant biotechnology in China [J].
Huang, JK ;
Rozelle, S ;
Pray, C ;
Wang, QF .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5555) :674-677
[26]  
HUANG JR, 2002, BIOTECHNOLOGY BOOSTS, V2
[27]  
HUDSON J, 2003, P BELTW COTT C, P1042
[28]  
Hurley TM, 2005, WAG UR FRON, V7, P81
[29]   Risk and the value of Bt corn [J].
Hurley, TM ;
Mitchell, PD ;
Rice, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (02) :345-358
[30]   Managing the risk of European corn borer resistance to Bt corn [J].
Hurley, TM ;
Secchi, S ;
Babcock, BA ;
Hellmich, RL .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 22 (04) :537-558