Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives

被引:443
作者
Wolff, S. [1 ]
Schulp, C. J. E. [1 ]
Verburg, P. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem service assessments; Indicators; Benefits; Preferences; Land use change; Spatial analysis; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND; MULTIFUNCTIONAL TRANSITION; RURAL AUSTRALIA; FRAMEWORK; RECREATION; POLICY; RIVER; OPPORTUNITIES; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Mapping the demand for ecosystem services (ES) has received increased attention in scientific research and is seen as a relevant tool to inform conservation planning, land use planning and management. Yet, there is a varying understanding of the concept of ES demand, which has implications on how and where ES demand is being mapped. In this paper we review the current conceptual understanding of ES demand, indicators to measure demand and the approaches used to quantify and map demand. We identified four distinct "demand types", which relate to different ecosystem service categories. These demand types include demand expressed in terms of (1) risk reduction, (2) preferences and values, (3) direct use or (4) consumption of goods and services. Each of the demand types was linked to specific methods applied in the reviewed literature. We found that operationalization of ES demand in policy, planning and management requires a more consistent understanding and definition of ES demand, its drivers and its temporal dynamics. Furthermore, the impact of demands for multiple ecosystem services on land use change needs to be investigated. This will allow for the consideration of temporal and cross-level interactions between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its impacts in land use change modelling. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 171
页数:13
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Social and ecological resilience: are they related?
    Adger, WN
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [2] [Anonymous], ECOL SOC
  • [3] From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Villa, Ferdinando
    Batker, David
    Harrison-Cox, Jennifer
    Voigt, Brian
    Johnson, Gary W.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (02):
  • [4] Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Johnson, Gary W.
    Voigt, Brian
    Villa, Ferdinando
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 : 117 - 125
  • [5] The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services
    Bastian, Olaf
    Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe
    Rosenberg, Matthias
    Rahe, Doreen
    Grunewald, Karsten
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 : 15 - 24
  • [6] Assessment of the water supply:demand ratios in a Mediterranean basin under different global change scenarios and mitigation alternatives
    Boithias, Laurie
    Acuna, Vicenc
    Vergonos, Laura
    Ziv, Guy
    Marce, Rafael
    Sabater, Sergi
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 470 : 567 - 577
  • [7] Opportunities to improve impact, integration, and evaluation of land change models
    Brown, Daniel G.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Pontius, Robert Gilmore, Jr.
    Lange, Mark D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (05) : 452 - 457
  • [8] Burkhard B., 2014, LANDSC ONLINE, V34, P1, DOI [10.3097/LO.201434, DOI 10.3097/LO.201434]
  • [9] Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Crossman, Neville
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Petz, Katalin
    Alkemade, Rob
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 : 1 - 3
  • [10] Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Kroll, Franziska
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Mueller, Felix
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 17 - 29