Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of ondansetron plus dexamethasone with or without metoclopramide as antiemetic prophylaxis in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin in medical practice

被引:12
作者
Ithimakin, Suthinee [1 ]
Runglodvatana, Kanakorn [1 ]
Nimmannit, Akarin [2 ]
Akewanlop, Charuwan [1 ]
Srimuninnimit, Vichien [1 ]
Keerativitayanan, Narong [1 ]
Soparattanapaisarn, Nopadol [1 ]
Laocharoenkeat, Apirom [3 ]
机构
[1] Siriraj Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Dept Med, Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Siriraj Hosp, Off Res & Dev, Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Siriraj Hosp, Dept Pharm, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Emetogenic chemotherapy; Anti-emetic; Metoclopramide; CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA; MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY; ANTAGONIST APREPITANT; DELAYED EMESIS; PREVENTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-011-1162-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Ondansetron plus dexamethasone are standard antiemetic agents for highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Metoclopramide is a dopamine antagonist, which may enhance efficacy of ondansetron and dexamethasone. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of metoclopramide added to standard antiemetic regimen for prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. Patients who received a parts per thousand yen50 mg/m(2) of cisplatin for the first time were given intravenous ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1 and were randomized to receive either standard antiemetics (ondansetron 8 mg orally bid on days 2-5 and dexamethasone 8 mg orally bid on days 2-4) plus metoclopramide 20 mg orally qid on days 2-5 or a placebo. The primary endpoint was a complete response (CR) rate defined as no emesis and no rescue treatment over a 120-h period. Secondary endpoints included severity of nausea and vomiting, time to first emesis, quality of life, and adverse effects. Among 162 patients, 50 patients (60%) in the metoclopramide group and 42 patients (53%) in the control group achieved CR (p = 0.36). The mean times to first emesis in the metoclopramide and control groups were 88 and 75 h, respectively (p = 0.18). The degrees of nausea and vomiting in both groups were similar. Eleven patients (13%) in the metoclopramide group and 20 (25%) in the control group required rescue treatment (p = 0.05). Quality of life and adverse effects were not different between the two groups. The addition of metoclopramide to ondansetron plus dexamethasone reduced the use of rescue medication, but did not affect complete response rate, quality of life or adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 855
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Blanchard EM, 2008, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC, P2639
[2]
Chemoradiation comparing cisplatin versus carboplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: Randomised, non-inferiority open trial [J].
Chitapanarux, Imjai ;
Lorvidhaya, Vicharn ;
Kamnerdsupaphon, Pimkhuan ;
Sumitsawan, Yupa ;
Tharacichitkul, Ekkasit ;
Sukthomya, Vimol ;
Ford, Judith .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (09) :1399-1406
[3]
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting-incidence and impact on patient quality of life at community oncology settings [J].
Cohen, Lorenzo ;
de Moor, Carl A. ;
Eisenberg, Peter ;
Ming, Eileen E. ;
Hu, Henry .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2007, 15 (05) :497-503
[4]
ONDANSETRON PLUS METOPIMAZINE COMPARED WITH ONDANSETRON ALONE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
HERRSTEDT, J ;
SIGSGAARD, T ;
BOESGAARD, M ;
JENSEN, TP ;
DOMBERNOWSKY, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (15) :1076-1080
[5]
Antiemetics: an update and the MASCC guidelines applied in clinical practice [J].
Herrstedt, Jorn .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 5 (01) :32-43
[6]
The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin - The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group [J].
Hesketh, PJ ;
Grunberg, SM ;
Gralla, RJ ;
Warr, DG ;
Roila, F ;
De Wit, R ;
Chawla, SP ;
Carides, AD ;
Ianus, J ;
Elmer, ME ;
Evans, JK ;
Beck, K ;
Reines, S ;
Horgan, KJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (22) :4112-4119
[7]
SEROTONIN ANTAGONISTS - A NEW CLASS OF ANTIEMETIC AGENTS [J].
HESKETH, PJ ;
GANDARA, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (09) :613-620
[8]
A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS ONDANSETRON ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INTRAVENOUS DEXAMETHASONE IN THE PREVENTION OF HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
HESKETH, PJ ;
HARVEY, WH ;
HARKER, WG ;
BECK, TM ;
RYAN, T ;
BRICKER, LJ ;
KISH, JA ;
MURPHY, WK ;
HAINSWORTH, JD ;
HALEY, B ;
PLAGGE, P ;
FLACK, NE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (03) :596-600
[9]
Consensus proposals for the prevention of acute and delayed vomiting and nausea following high-emetic-risk chemotherapy [J].
Kris, MG ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Herrstedt, J ;
Rittenberg, C ;
Einhorn, LH ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, J ;
Olver, I ;
Borjeson, S ;
Ballatori, E .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2005, 13 (02) :85-96
[10]
Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients' daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall [J].
Martin, AR ;
Pearson, JD ;
Cai, B ;
Elmer, M ;
Horgan, K ;
Lindley, C .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2003, 11 (08) :522-527