Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone

被引:43
作者
Agbaje, Jimoh Olubanwo
Jacobs, Reinhilde
Maes, Frederik
Michiels, Katleen
van Steenberghe, Daniel
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Oral Imaging Ctr, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Periodontol, Fac Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Med Image Comp, ESAT PSI, Fac Engn, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
bone volume; cone beam CT; jaw; tooth socket; volumetry;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01134.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: The volume of 40 dental alveoli in nine dry skull specimens (four mandibles and five maxillae) was determined by measuring the volume of the tooth socket impression using the water displacement technique. This was considered as the gold standard. Then, the tooth socket was scanned with CBCT and data were uploaded in the semi-automated Livewire (R) segmentation software. The software segments the tooth socket in consecutive 1 mm-thick two-dimensional slices. After segmentation, the total volume of the delineated socket was computed. The statistical difference between direct volumetric measurements and those obtained with CBCT imaging was assessed using the Student paired t-test. Result: The mean socket volume of the skull specimens was 227 +/- 91 mm(3) when obtained by direct measurement and 225 +/- 90 mm(3) when obtained by CBCT imaging. Student paired t-test showed no significant differences between both volume measurements (p > 0.1). Conclusions: CBCT permits imaging of anatomical structures in three planes and allows for reliable volume estimates. The results should be verified in clinical circumstances and might have potential applicability for evaluation of extraction socket healing under different conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 990
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aboudara C A, 2003, Orthod Craniofac Res, V6 Suppl 1, P173, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.253.x
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ORTHOD CRANIFOC R S1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13181-011-0207-X
[3]   Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay™):: system configuration and physical properties [J].
Araki, K ;
Maki, K ;
Seki, K ;
Sakamaki, K ;
Harata, Y ;
Sakaino, R ;
Okano, T ;
Seo, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (01) :51-59
[4]  
Barrett W A, 1997, Med Image Anal, V1, P331, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(97)85005-0
[5]  
Butler JR, 1998, INT J PERIODONT REST, V18, P59
[6]   Radiation dose in dental radiology [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Kemper, J ;
Möbes, O ;
Pawelzik, J ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :634-637
[7]  
Danforth Robert A, 2003, J Calif Dent Assoc, V31, P817
[8]   Quantitative assessment of post-extraction heating and alveolar ridge remodelling of the mandible in female rats [J].
Elsubeihi, ES ;
Heersche, JNM .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (05) :401-412
[9]   VOLUME MEASUREMENTS OF NORMAL ORBITAL STRUCTURES BY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS [J].
FORBES, G ;
GEHRING, DG ;
GORMAN, CA ;
BRENNAN, MD ;
JACKSON, IT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 145 (01) :149-154
[10]   State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement [J].
Guerrero, ME ;
Jacobs, R ;
Loubele, M ;
Schutyser, F ;
Suetens, P ;
van Steenberghe, D .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (01) :1-7