Incidence and patterns of recurrence after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal adenocarcinoma

被引:62
作者
Akasu, Takayuki [1 ]
Takawa, Masashi [1 ]
Yamamoto, Seiichiro [1 ]
Fujita, Shin [1 ]
Moriya, Yoshihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Colorectal Surg, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SPHINCTER-SAVING RESECTION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOWER; 3RD; CANCER; THERAPY; ANASTOMOSIS; DYSFUNCTION; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.036
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and patterns of recurrence, or oncologic safety, after intersphincteric resection (ISR) without radiotherapy for very low rectal adenocarcinoma. Study Design: One hundred eight consecutive patients with T1-T3 rectal cancers located 1 to 5 cm (median 3 cm) from the anal verge underwent ISR. A retrospective analysis of prospectively recorded data from the 106 patients not receiving radiotherapy was performed. Results: There were 23 T1, 40 T2, and 43 T3 tumors. Morbidity and mortality rates were 33% and 1%, respectively. The 3-year rates of overall local recurrence and survival were 5.7% and 95%, respectively. The 3-year cumulative local recurrence rate was 0% for the patients with T1-T2 tumors as compared with 15% for those with T3 tumors (p = 0.0012). In T3 tumors, the 2-year local recurrence rate was 5% for patients with negative surgical margins as compared with 33% for those with positive margins (p = 0.0001). The incidences of distant recurrence for stages 1, 11, 111, and IV disease were 4%, 5%, 18%, and 33%, respectively. Conclusions: ISR does not increase local or distant recurrences. For T1-T2 tumors, meticulous dissection and irrigation after closure of the distal stump allows local control without radiotherapy. With T3 tumors, preoperative therapy should be considered if resection margins are estimated to be insufficient.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 647
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer [J].
Sugihara, Kenichi ;
Kobayashi, Hirotoshi ;
Kato, Tomoyuki ;
Mori, Takeo ;
Mochizuki, Hidetaka ;
Kameoka, Shingo ;
Shirouzu, Kazuo ;
Muto, Tetsuichiro .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (11) :1663-1672
[22]   Radiological findings do not support lateral residual turnour as a major cause of local recurrence of rectal cancer [J].
Syk, E ;
Torkzad, MR ;
Blomqvist, L ;
Ljungqvist, O ;
Glimelius, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (01) :113-119
[23]   Preoperative parameters expanding the indication of sphincter preserving surgery in patients with advanced low rectal cancer [J].
Ueno, H ;
Mochizuki, H ;
Hashiguchi, Y ;
Ishikawa, K ;
Fujimoto, H ;
Shinto, E ;
Hase, K .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (01) :34-42
[24]   MR imaging for the preoperative planning of sphincter-saving surgery for tumors of the lower third of the rectum:: Use of intravenous and endorectal contrast materials [J].
Urban, M ;
Rosen, HR ;
Hölbling, N ;
Feil, W ;
Hochwarther, G ;
Hruby, W ;
Schiessel, R .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :503-508
[25]  
VERNAVA AM, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V175, P333
[26]   Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer [J].
Wibe, A ;
Rendedal, PR ;
Svensson, E ;
Norstein, J ;
Eide, TJ ;
Myrvold, HE ;
Soreide, O .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) :327-334