Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Comparable to Mammographic Spot Views for Mass Characterization

被引:120
作者
Noroozian, Mitra [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir [1 ]
Rahnama-Moghadam, Sahand [2 ]
Klein, Katherine A. [1 ]
Jeffries, Deborah O. [1 ]
Pinsky, Renee W. [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Carson, Paul L. [1 ]
Helvie, Mark A. [1 ]
Roubidoux, Marilyn A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Internal Med, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
POPULATION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.11101763
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine if digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) performs comparably to mammographic spot views (MSVs) in characterizing breast masses as benign or malignant. Materials and Methods: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant reader study obtained informed consent from all subjects. Four blinded Mammography Quality Standards Act-certified academic radiologists individually evaluated DBT images and MSVs of 67 masses (30 malignant, 37 benign) in 67 women (age range, 34-88 years). Images were viewed in random order at separate counterbalanced sessions and were rated for visibility (10-point scale), likelihood of malignancy (12-point scale), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification. Differences in mass visibility were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. Reader performance was measured by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) and partial area index above a sensitivity threshold of 0.90 (A(z)(0.90)) by using likelihood of malignancy ratings. Masses categorized as BI-RADS 4 or 5 were compared with histopathologic analysis to determine true-positive results for each modality. Results: Mean mass visibility ratings were slightly better with DBT (range, 3.2-4.4) than with MSV (range, 3.8-4.8) for all four readers, with one reader's improvement achieving statistical significance (P = .001). The A(z) ranged 0.89-0.93 for DBT and 0.88-0.93 for MSV (P > .23). The A(z) (0.90) ranged 0.36-0.52 for DBT and 0.25-0.40 for MSV (P > .20). The readers characterized seven additional malignant masses as BI-RADS 4 or 5 with DBT than with MSV, at a cost of five false-positive biopsy recommendations, with a mean of 1.8 true-positive (range, 0-3) and 1.3 false-positive (range, 2 1 to 4) assessments per reader. Conclusion: In this small study, mass characterization in terms of visibility ratings, reader performance, and BI-RADS assessment with DBT was similar to that with MSVs. Preliminary findings suggest that MSV might not be necessary for mass characterization when performing DBT. (C) RSNA, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings [J].
Andersson, Ingvar ;
Ikeda, Debra M. ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Ruschin, Mark ;
Svahn, Tony ;
Timberg, Pontus ;
Tingberg, Anders .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) :2817-2825
[2]   EQUIVOCAL MAMMOGRAPHIC FINDINGS - EVALUATION WITH SPOT COMPRESSION [J].
BERKOWITZ, JE ;
GATEWOOD, OMB ;
GAYLER, BW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (02) :369-371
[3]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
METZ, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :723-731
[4]   High speed, large angle mammography tomosynthesis system - art. no. 61420C [J].
Eberhard, Jeffrey W. ;
Staudinger, Paul ;
Smolenski, Joe ;
Ding, Jason ;
Schmitz, Andrea ;
McCoy, Julie ;
Rumsey, Michael ;
Al-Khalidy, Abdulrahman ;
Ross, William ;
Landberg, Cynthia E. ;
Claus, Bernhard E. H. ;
Carson, Paul ;
Goodsitt, Mitchell ;
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Roubidoux, Marilyn ;
Thomas, Jerry A. ;
Osland, Jacqueline .
Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1-3, 2006, 6142 :C1420-C1420
[5]   Sample size estimation: A glimpse beyond simple formulas [J].
Eng, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :606-612
[6]   EFFICACY OF SPOT COMPRESSION MAGNIFICATION AND TANGENTIAL VIEWS IN MAMMOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF PALPABLE BREAST MASSES [J].
FAULK, RM ;
SICKLES, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 (01) :87-90
[7]   Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study [J].
Gennaro, Gisella ;
Toledano, Alicia ;
di Maggio, Cosimo ;
Baldan, Enrica ;
Bezzon, Elisabetta ;
La Grassa, Manuela ;
Pescarini, Luigi ;
Polico, Ilaria ;
Proietti, Alessandro ;
Toffoli, Aida ;
Muzzio, Pier Carlo .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (07) :1545-1553
[8]   Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study [J].
Good, Walter F. ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Catullo, Victor J. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Gur, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :865-869
[9]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study [J].
Gur, David ;
Abrams, Gordon S. ;
Chough, Denise M. ;
Ganott, Marie A. ;
Hakim, Christiane M. ;
Perrin, Ronald L. ;
Rathfon, Grace Y. ;
Sumkin, Jules H. ;
Zuley, Margarita L. ;
Bandos, Andriy I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (02) :586-591
[10]   Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: An ROC study [J].
Hadjiiski, L ;
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Helvie, MA ;
Roubidoux, MA ;
Blane, C ;
Paramagul, C ;
Petrick, N ;
Bailey, J ;
Klein, K ;
Foster, M ;
Patterson, S ;
Adler, D ;
Nees, A ;
Shen, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (01) :255-265