More postoperative femoral fractures with the Gamma nail than the sliding screw plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures

被引:71
作者
Osnes, EK
Lofthus, CM
Falch, JA
Meyer, HE
Stensvold, I
Kristiansen, IS
Nordsletten, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulleval Hosp, Oslo Orthopaed Univ Clin, NO-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Aker Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Natl Hlth Screening Serv, Oslo, Norway
[4] Natl Board Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[5] Univ So Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth Hlth Econ, Odense, Denmark
来源
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA | 2001年 / 72卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00016470152846574
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite several studies showing a higher incidence of peri-implant femoral fractures with the Gamma nail than with a sliding strew plate (SSP), the Gamma nail has remained the standard implant for trochanteric fractures in many hospitals, We recorded 921 trochanteric fractures in the city of Oslo during 2 years and compared the reoperation frequency in patients treated with the Gamma nail (n 379) and SSP (n 542). The distribution of age and gender in the two treatment groups was the same, 65 patients were reoperated on, several of them more than once, The only significant difference between the two surgical methods in complications leading to a reoperation was the frequency of femoral shaft fractures. 17 of the patients treated with the Gamma nail had a new femoral fracture postoperatively, compared to 3 of those with a SSP, The relative risk of another femoral fracture after surgery was 12 (95% CI: 2.7-52) if the surgical device was a Gamma nail compared to a SSP, The Gamma nail therefore can not be recommended as the standard implant for trochanteric fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 256
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
GAMMA-NAIL VS COMPRESSION SCREW FOR TROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES - 15 REOPERATIONS IN A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 378 PATIENTS [J].
AUNE, AK ;
EKELAND, A ;
ODEGAARD, B ;
GROGAARD, B ;
ALHO, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (02) :127-130
[2]
BJORGUL K, 1998, P NORW SURG SOC, P149
[3]
Boriani S, 1996, ORTHOPEDICS, V19, P597
[4]
FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA-NAIL AND THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW [J].
BRIDLE, SH ;
PATEL, AD ;
BIRCHER, M ;
CALVERT, PT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02) :330-334
[5]
COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND GAMMA-NAIL - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BUTT, MS ;
KRIKLER, SJ ;
NAFIE, S ;
ALI, MS .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (09) :615-618
[6]
THE TREATMENT OF TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR [J].
EVANS, EM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1949, 31 (02) :190-203
[7]
THE GAMMA-NAIL FOR PERITROCHANTERIC FRACTURES [J].
HALDER, SC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (03) :340-344
[8]
An experimental study of the failure modes of the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw under static loading: a cadaveric study [J].
Haynes, RC ;
Poll, RG ;
Miles, AW ;
Weston, RB .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1997, 19 (05) :446-453
[9]
Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: A randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw [J].
Hoffman, CW ;
Lynskey, TG .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (03) :151-155
[10]
CLASSIFICATION OF TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES [J].
JENSEN, JS .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 51 (05) :803-810