Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings

被引:814
作者
Jiang, MY [1 ]
Zhang, JH [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Kowloon Tong, Peoples R China
关键词
abscisic acid; active oxygen species; antioxidant defence system; oxidative damage; oxidative stress; Zea mays;
D O I
10.1093/pcp/pce162
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Leaves of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings were supplied with different concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA). Its effects on the levels of superoxide radical (O-2(-)), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the content of catalytic Fe, the activities of several antioxidative enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR), the contents of several non-enzymatic antioxidants such as ascorbate (ASC, reduced glutathione (GSH), alpha -tocopherol (alpha -TOC) and carotenoid (CAR), and the degrees of the oxidative damage to the membrane lipids and proteins were examined. Treatment with 10 and 100 muM ABA significantly increased the levels of O-2(-) and H2O2, followed by an increase in activities of SOD, CAT, APX and GR, and the contents of ASC, H, alpha -TOC and CAR in a dose- and time-dependent pattern in leaves of maize seedlings. An oxidative damage expressed as lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and plasma membrane leakage did not occur except for a slight increase with 100 muM ABA treatment for 24 h. Treatment with 1,000 muM ABA led to a more abundant generation of O(2)and H2O2 and a significant increase in the content of catalytic Fe, which is critical for H2O2-dependent hydroxyl radical production. The activities of these antioxidative enzymes and the contents of alpha -TOC and CAR were still maintained at a higher level, but no longer further enhanced when compared with the treatment of 100 muM ABA. The contents of ASC and GSH had no changes in leaves treated with 1,000 muM ABA. These results indicate that treatment with low concentrations of ABA (10 to 100 muM) induced an antioxidative defence response against oxidative damage, but a high concentration of ABA (1,000 muM) induced an excessive generation of AOS and led to an oxidative damage in plant cells.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1273
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   EVIDENCE FOR CHILLING-INDUCED OXIDATIVE STRESS IN MAIZE SEEDLINGS AND A REGULATORY ROLE FOR HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE [J].
PRASAD, TK ;
ANDERSON, MD ;
MARTIN, BA ;
STEWART, CR .
PLANT CELL, 1994, 6 (01) :65-74
[42]   Influence of salicylic acid on H2O2 production, oxidative stress, and H2O2-metabolizing enzymes - Salicylic acid-mediated oxidative damage requires H2O2 [J].
Rao, MV ;
Paliyath, C ;
Ormrod, DP ;
Murr, DP ;
Watkins, CB .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 115 (01) :137-149
[43]  
REZNICK AZ, 1994, METHOD ENZYMOL, V233, P357
[44]   STRUCTURE AND DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE TO ABSCISIC-ACID OF 2 PROMOTERS FOR THE CYTOSOLIC COPPER ZINC-SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE GENES, SODCC1 AND SODCC2, IN RICE PROTOPLASTS [J].
SAKAMOTO, A ;
OKUMURA, T ;
KAMINAKA, H ;
SUMI, K ;
TANAKA, K .
FEBS LETTERS, 1995, 358 (01) :62-66
[45]   CHLOROPLAST GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE [J].
SCHAEDLE, M ;
BASSHAM, JA .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1977, 59 (05) :1011-1012
[46]   Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic plants by targeting mannitol biosynthesis to chloroplasts [J].
Shen, B ;
Jensen, RG ;
Bohnert, HJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 113 (04) :1177-1183
[47]   Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response [J].
Shinozaki, K ;
YamaguchiShinozaki, K .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 115 (02) :327-334
[48]   Abscisic acid-dependent and -independent expression of the carrot late-embryogenesis-abundant-class gene Dc3 in transgenic tobacco seedlings [J].
Siddiqui, NU ;
Chung, HJ ;
Thomas, TL ;
Drew, MC .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 118 (04) :1181-1190
[49]   TANSLEY REVIEW .52. THE ROLE OF ACTIVE OXYGEN IN THE RESPONSE OF PLANTS TO WATER-DEFICIT AND DESICCATION [J].
SMIRNOFF, N .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1993, 125 (01) :27-58
[50]   Control of abscisic acid synthesis [J].
Taylor, IB ;
Burbidge, A ;
Thompson, AJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2000, 51 (350) :1563-1574