Sensor noise suppression

被引:65
作者
de Cheveigne, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simon, Jonathan Z. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] ENS, Equipe Audit, Dept Etud Cognit, F-75230 Paris, France
[2] CNRS, UMR 2929, Lab Psychol Percept, F-75700 Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris 05, F-75270 Paris 06, France
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Biol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
MEG; EEG; magnetoencephalography; electroencephalography; noise suppression; artifact suppression; PCA; subspace methods; projection methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 [生物化学与分子生物学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
We present a method to remove the effects of sensor-specific noise in multi p] e-channel recordings such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG). The method assumes that every source of interest is picked up by more than one sensor, as is the case with systems with spatially dense sensors. To reduce noise, each sensor signal is projected on the subspace spanned by its neighbors and replaced by its projection. In this process, components specific to the sensor (typically wide-band noise and/or 'glitches') are eliminated, while sources of interest are retained. Evaluation with real and simulated MEG signals shows that the method removes sensor-specific noise effectively, without removing or distorting signals of interest. It complements existing noise-reduction methods that target environmental or physiological noise. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method [J].
Adachi, Y ;
Shimogawara, M ;
Higuchi, M ;
Haruta, Y ;
Ochiai, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2001, 11 (01) :669-672
[2]
Ahmar NE, 2005, I IEEE EMBS C NEUR E, P29
[3]
Electromagnetic brain mapping [J].
Baillet, S ;
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2001, 18 (06) :14-30
[4]
Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals [J].
Barbati, G ;
Porcaro, C ;
Zappasodi, F ;
Rossini, PM ;
Tecchio, F .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (05) :1220-1232
[5]
Spatial filter approach for evaluation of the surface Laplacian of the electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram [J].
Bradshaw, LA ;
Wikswo, JP .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 29 (03) :202-213
[6]
Human auditory cortical processing of changes in interaural correlation [J].
Chait, M ;
Poeppel, D ;
de Cheveigné, A ;
Simon, JZ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 25 (37) :8518-8527
[7]
Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review [J].
Croft, RJ ;
Barry, RJ .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 30 (01) :5-19
[8]
Denoising based on time-shift PCA [J].
de Cheveigne, Alain ;
Simon, Jonathan Z. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 165 (02) :297-305
[9]
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis [J].
Delorme, A ;
Makeig, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2004, 134 (01) :9-21
[10]
High gamma activity in response to deviant auditory stimuli recorded directly from human cortex [J].
Edwards, E ;
Soltani, M ;
Deouell, LY ;
Berger, MS ;
Knight, RT .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 94 (06) :4269-4280