IMRT treatment planning -: A comparative inter-system and intor-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group

被引:87
作者
Bohsung, J
Gillis, S
Arrans, R
Bakai, A
De Wagter, C
Knöös, T
Mijnheer, BJ
Paiusco, M
Perrin, BA
Welleweerd, H
Williams, P
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin Standort Mitte, Klin Strahlentherapie, Dept Radiotherapy, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] State Univ Ghent Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Hosp Virgen Macarena, Dept Radiotherapy, Seville, Spain
[4] Univ Tubingen Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Lund Hosp, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[6] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Santa Maria Nuova Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[8] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[9] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
intensity-modulated radiation therapy; treatment planning; multi-centre intercomparison;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2005.08.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background and purpose: The purpose of this work was a comparison of realistic IMRT plans based on the same CT-image data set and a common predefined set of dose objectives for the planning target volume and the organs at risk. This work was part of the larger European QUASIMODO IMRT verification project. Materials and methods: Eleven IMRT. plans were produced by nine different European groups, each applying a representative set of. clinically used IMRT treatment planning systems. The plans produced were to be deliverable in a clinically acceptable treatment time with the local technical equipment. All plans were characterized using a set of different quality measures such as dose-volume histograms, number of monitor units and treatment time. Results: Only one plan was able to fulfil all dose objectives strictly; six plans failed some of the objectives but were still considered to be clinically acceptable; four plans were not able to reach the objectives. Additional quality scores such as the number of monitor units and treatment time showed large variations, which mainly depend on the delivery technique. Conclusion: The presented planning study showed that with nearly all presently available IMRT planning and delivery systems comparable dose distributions could be achieved if the planning goals are clearly defined in advance. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 361
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
Alber M, 2000, USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, P46
[2]
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Butler, EB ;
DiPetrillo, TA ;
Engler, MJ ;
Fraass, B ;
Grant, W ;
Ling, CC ;
Low, DA ;
Mackie, TR ;
Mohan, R ;
Purdy, JA ;
Roach, M ;
Rosenman, JG ;
Verhey, LJ ;
Wong, JW ;
Cumberlin, RL ;
Stone, H ;
Palta, JR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04) :880-914
[3]
Delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional multileaf collimator: Comparison of dynamic and segmental methods [J].
Chui, CS ;
Chan, MF ;
Yorke, E ;
Spirou, S ;
Ling, CC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (12) :2441-2449
[4]
Report of a study on IMRT planning strategies for ethmoid sinus cancer [J].
Claus, F ;
Mijnheer, B ;
Rasch, C ;
Bortfeld, T ;
Fraass, B ;
De Gersem, W ;
Wirtz, H ;
Hoinkis, C ;
Cho, BC ;
Kwong, LWD ;
Bae, H ;
Muller, K ;
De Neve, W .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (10) :572-576
[5]
Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): First clinical experience [J].
Duthoy, W ;
De Gersem, W ;
Vergote, K ;
Coghe, M ;
Boterberg, T ;
De Deene, Y ;
De Wagter, C ;
Van Belle, S ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04) :1019-1032
[6]
Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer [J].
Duthoy, W ;
De Gersem, W ;
Vergote, K ;
Boterberg, T ;
Derie, C ;
Smeets, P ;
De Wagter, C ;
De Neve, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (03) :794-806
[7]
Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [J].
Ezzell, GA ;
Galvin, JM ;
Low, D ;
Palta, JR ;
Rosen, I ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Xia, P ;
Xiao, Y ;
Xing, L ;
Yu, CX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2089-2115
[8]
Comparative analysis of intensity modulation inverse planning modules of three commercial treatment planning systems applied to head and neck tumour model [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Bolsi, A ;
Cozzi, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 66 (01) :29-40
[9]
Estimates of whole-body dose equivalent produced by beam intensity modulated conformal therapy [J].
Followill, D ;
Geis, P ;
Boyer, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (03) :667-672
[10]
Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: A joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine [J].
Galvin, JM ;
Ezzell, G ;
Eisbrauch, A ;
Yu, C ;
Butler, B ;
Xiao, Y ;
Rosen, I ;
Rosenman, J ;
Sharpe, M ;
Xing, L ;
Xia, P ;
Lomax, T ;
Low, DA ;
Palta, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (05) :1616-1634