Catalytic inhibition of laminar flames by transition metal compounds

被引:88
作者
Linteris, Gregory T. [1 ]
Rumminger, Marc D. [2 ]
Babushok, Valeri I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Bldg & Fire Res Lab, Fire Res Div, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[2] LLC, Cleaire Adv Emiss Controls, San Leandro, CA 94577 USA
[3] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Chem Sci & Technol Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
flame inhibition; halon replacement; fire suppression; nanoparticles; fuel additives; transition metals;
D O I
10.1016/j.pecs.2007.08.002
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Some of the most effective flame inhibitors ever found are metallic compounds. Their effectiveness, however, drops off rapidly with an increase of agent concentration, and varies widely with flame type. Iron pentacarbonyl, for example, can be up to two orders of magnitude more efficient than CF3Br for reducing the burning velocity of premixed laminar flames when added at low volume fraction; nevertheless, it is nearly ineffective for extinction of co-flow diffusion flames. This article outlines previous research into flame inhibition by metal-containing compounds, and for more recent work, focuses on experimental and modeling studies of inhibited premixed, counterflow diffusion, and co-flow diffusion flames by the present authors. The strong flame inhibition by metal compounds when added at low volume fraction is found to occur through the gas-phase catalytic cycles leading to a highly effective radical recombination in the reaction zone. While the reactions of these cycles proceed in some cases at close to collisional. rates, the agent effectiveness requires that the inhibiting species and the radicals in the flame overlap, and this can sometimes be limited by gas-phase transport rates. The metal species often lose their effectiveness above a certain volume fraction due to condensation processes. The influence of particle formation on inhibitor effectiveness depends upon the metal species concentration, particle size, residence time for particle formation, local flame temperature, and the drag and thermophoretic forces in the flame. Published by Elsevier ftd.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 329
页数:42
相关论文
共 153 条
[71]   Gas-phase thermochemistry of iron oxides and hydroxides: Portrait of a super-efficient flame suppressant [J].
Kellogg, CB ;
Irikura, KK .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1999, 103 (08) :1150-1159
[72]   Morphology of chromium emissions from a laminar hydrogen diffusion flame [J].
Kennedy, IM ;
Zhang, Y ;
Jones, AD ;
Chang, DPY ;
Kelly, PB ;
Yoon, Y .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1999, 116 (1-2) :233-242
[73]  
Korobeinichev O. P., 2004, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, V30, P2353
[74]  
KOVARIK B, 1994, FUELS LUBRICANTS
[75]  
LAHAYE J, 1994, SOOT FORMATION COMBU
[76]  
Lask G., 1962, P COMBUST INST, V8, P432
[77]  
Linteris G.T., 2001, POWDER MATRIX SYSTEM
[78]   Cup-burner flame extinguishment by CF3Br and Br2 [J].
Linteris, Gregory T. ;
Takahashi, Fumiaki ;
Katta, Viswanath R. .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2007, 149 (1-2) :91-103
[79]   Inhibition of premixed methane-air flames by fluoromethanes [J].
Linteris, GT ;
Truett, L .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1996, 105 (1-2) :15-27
[80]   Premixed carbon monoxide-nitrous oxide-hydrogen flames: Measured and calculated burning velocities with and without Fe(CO)(5) [J].
Linteris, GT ;
Rumminger, MD ;
Babushok, VI .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2000, 122 (1-2) :58-75