Legislative fractionalization and partisan shifts to the left increase the volatility of public energy R&D expenditures

被引:16
作者
Baccini, Leonardo [2 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
Public energy R&D; Volatility; Legislative politics; TECHNOLOGY; POLICY; INVESTMENT; REGRESSION; ECONOMY; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article shows that legislative fractionalization and leftward (but not rightward) partisan shifts increase the volatility of public R&D expenditures in new energy technologies. We develop a highly accurate estimator for public energy R&D expenditures, and examine deviations from the estimated values using data for member states of the International Energy Agency, 1981-2007. Given that unpredictable fluctuation in public spending on new energy technology reduces the positive effect of such spending on innovation, our empirical analyses imply that countries with fractionalized legislatures can improve the performance of their energy technology programs by enacting institutional mechanisms that reduce the volatility of public spending. Similarly, the results indicate that left-wing and right-wing governments can improve the performance of public technology programs through agreements that distribute gains in such a fashion that partisan shifts do not cause spending cuts. Contravening the conventional wisdom, we also find that public energy R&D is unusually stable in the United States. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 57
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]   Robust incentives and the design of a climate change governance regime [J].
Nemet, Gregory F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :7216-7225
[22]  
Nooruddin Irfan., 2010, Coalition Politics and Economic Development
[23]   Creating incentives for environmentally enhancing technological change: Lessons from 30 years of US energy technology policy [J].
Norberg-Bohm, V .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2000, 65 (02) :125-148
[24]  
PAOLINO P, 2001, POLIT ANAL, V0009
[25]  
Pelgram W.M., 1991, TECHNOLOGY PORK BARR
[26]   Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries [J].
Potrafke, Niklas .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2010, 143 (1-2) :135-155
[27]   POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC-DETERMINANTS OF BUDGET DEFICITS IN THE INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACIES [J].
ROUBINI, N ;
SACHS, JD .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1989, 33 (05) :903-933
[28]   A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables [J].
Smithson, M ;
Verkuilen, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 11 (01) :54-71
[29]   THE INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATION OF CONGRESS - OR, WHY LEGISLATURES, LIKE FIRMS, ARE NOT ORGANIZED AS MARKETS [J].
WEINGAST, BR ;
MARSHALL, WJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1988, 96 (01) :132-163