Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose

被引:160
作者
Wintersperger, B [1 ]
Jacobs, T [1 ]
Herzog, P [1 ]
Schaller, S [1 ]
Nikolaou, K [1 ]
Suess, C [1 ]
Weber, C [1 ]
Reiser, M [1 ]
Becker, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Clin Radiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
computed tomography; (CT)vertical bar angiography; computed tomography (CT)vertical bar contrast enhancement; Aorta vertical bar CT; Radiations vertical bar exposure to patients and personnel;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to implement an abdominal CT angiography protocol using 100 kVp and to compare SNR and CNR, as well as subjective image quality, to a standard CT angiography protocol using 120 kVp on a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Forty-eight patients were referred for routine abdominal CT angiography on a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Patients were scanned using either 120 or 100 kVp at constant mAs settings. Vessel opacification was provided by automated contrast injection using similar injection protocols. Density measurements were performed along the aorto-iliac axis with SNR and CNR calculation. In addition, the estimated effective patient radiation dose was calculated. Results of both protocols were compared. The 100-kVp protocol (432180 HU) showed a significantly higher vessel density than the 120-kVp (333 /- 90 HU; P<0.001) protocol, corresponding to an average increase in signal intensity of 30.7%. SNR (36.0 vs 37.0) and CNR (31.1 vs 31.7) for the 100-kV protocol were not significantly lower that those for the standard protocol (P=0.79 and P=0.87), whilst the average estimated dose was significantly lower using the 100-kVp protocol (6.7 +/- 0.4 vs 10.1 +/- 1.2 mSv; P<0.0001). Tube kVp reduction from 120 to 100 kVp allows for significant reduction of patient dose in abdominal CT angiography, without significant change in SNR,CNR and image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 341
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight [J].
Awai, K ;
Hiraishi, K ;
Hori, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (01) :142-150
[2]   Xenon versus ceramics: A comparison of two CT X-ray detector systems [J].
Becker, CR ;
Bruening, R ;
Schaetzl, M ;
Schoepf, UJ ;
Reiser, MF .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (05) :795-799
[3]  
Bongartz G, 1999, 16262 EUR EN
[4]   Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey [J].
Brix, G ;
Nagel, HD ;
Stamm, G ;
Veit, R ;
Lechel, U ;
Griebel, J ;
Galanski, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (08) :1979-1991
[5]   Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Poll, LW ;
Puettmann, C ;
Ewen, K ;
Saleh, A ;
Mödder, U .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) :1148-1153
[6]   Multi-detector row CT angiography of the brain at various kilovoltage settings [J].
Ertl-Wagner, BB ;
Hoffmann, RT ;
Bruning, R ;
Herrmann, K ;
Snyder, B ;
Blume, JD ;
Reiser, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :528-535
[7]   Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT [J].
Huda, W ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Levin, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) :430-435
[8]   How do radiographic techniques affect image quality and patient doses in CT? [J].
Huda, W ;
Ravenel, JG ;
Scalzetti, EM .
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2002, 23 (05) :411-422
[9]   Spiral CT and radiation dose [J].
Imhof, H ;
Schibany, N ;
Ba-Ssalamah, A ;
Czerny, C ;
Hojreh, A ;
Kainberger, F ;
Krestan, C ;
Kudler, H ;
Nöbauer, I ;
Nowotny, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 47 (01) :29-37
[10]   Spiral CT angiography of the renal arteries: Should a scan delay based on a test bolus injection or a fixed scan delay be used to obtain maximum enhancement of the vessels? [J].
Kaatee, R ;
Van Leeuwen, MS ;
De Lange, EE ;
Wilting, JE ;
Beek, FJA ;
Beutler, JJ ;
Mali, WPTM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) :541-547