Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: A randomized controlled trial

被引:313
作者
Korevaar, JC
Feith, GW
Dekker, FW
van Manen, JG
Boeschoten, EW
Bossuyt, PMM
Krediet, RT
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Gelderse Vallei Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Ede, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Dianet AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; randomized controlled trial; survival; quality of life;
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00321.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Up-until-now, the survival and health-related quality of life of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients has only been compared in observational studies. These studies have reported small and opposing differences between both modalities. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of hemodialysis as initial chronic dialysis treatment with that of peritoneal dialysis in a randomized controlled trial. Methods. All new dialysis patients from 38 dialysis centers in The Netherlands without indications against either modality were invited to participate. Patients were assigned to start with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The primary outcome was mean quality-adjusted life year (QALY) score. Secondary outcome was survival. Results. Due to the low inclusion rate, the trial was prematurely stopped after which 38 patients had been randomized: 18 patients to hemodialysis and 20 to peritoneal dialysis. The mean QALY score in the first 2 years was 59.1 (SD 12) for hemodialysis patients versus 54.0 (SD 19) for peritoneal dialysis patients, which constitutes a small difference in favor of hemodialysis of 5.1 (95% CI 7.3 to 17.6) After 5 years of follow-up, nine hemodialysis and five peritoneal dialysis patients had died, a significant difference in survival; hazard ration of hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis of 3.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 12.6). After adjustment for age, comorbidity, and primary kidney disease the hazard ratio was 3.6 (0.8 to 15.4). Conclusion. Only a small difference in QALY score was observed between patients who started with hemodialysis compared to patients who started with peritoneal dialysis, lending support for the equivalence hypothesis. The significant difference in longer-term survival, which favored peritoneal dialysis in this small group of patients, could be used to posit that incident dialysis patients might benefit from starting on peritoneal dialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:2222 / 2228
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Survival on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis over 12 years with emphasis on nutritional parameters [J].
Avram, MM ;
Sreedhara, R ;
Fein, P ;
Oo, KK ;
Chattopadhyay, J ;
Mittman, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 37 (01) :S77-S80
[2]  
Bargman JM, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P2158, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V12102158
[3]  
BIESEN WV, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P116
[4]  
BLOEMBERGEN WE, 1995, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V6, P177
[5]   Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis [J].
Collins, AJ ;
Hao, WL ;
Xia, H ;
Ebben, JP ;
Everson, SE ;
Constantini, EG ;
Ma, JZ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1999, 34 (06) :1065-1074
[6]  
Davies SJ, 2001, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V21, pS269
[7]   Why ''underpowered'' trials are not necessarily unethical [J].
Edwards, SJL ;
Lilford, RJ ;
Braunholtz, D ;
Jackson, J .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9080) :804-807
[8]  
Essink-Bot M L, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P237, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020307
[9]   Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates [J].
Fenton, SSA ;
Schaubel, DE ;
Desmeules, M ;
Morrison, HI ;
Mao, Y ;
Copleston, P ;
Jeffery, JR ;
Kjellstrand, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1997, 30 (03) :334-342
[10]   Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis [J].
Heaf, JG ;
Lokkegaard, H ;
Madsen, M .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 17 (01) :112-117