Accuracy of ultrasound-based (BAT) prostate-repositioning:: A three-dimensional on-line fiducial-based assessment with cone-beam computed tomography

被引:41
作者
Boda-Heggemann, Judit [1 ]
Koehler, Frederick Marc [1 ]
Koepper, Beate [1 ]
Wolff, Dirk [1 ]
Wertz, Hansjoerg [1 ]
Mai, Sabine [1 ]
Hesser, Jorgen [1 ]
Lohr, Frank [1 ]
Wenz, Frederik [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Univ Med Ctr, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2008年 / 70卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate; image guidance; ultrasound-based positioning; cone-beam CT; fiducial;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound-based repositioning (BAT) before prostate radiation with fiducial-based three-dimensional matching with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients and Methods: Fifty-four positionings in 8 patients with I-125 seeds/intraprostatic calcifications as fiducials were evaluated. Patients were initially positioned according to skin marks and after this according to bony structures based on CBCT. Prostate position correction was then performed with BAT. Residual error after repositioning based on skin marks, bony anatomy, and BAT was estimated by a second CBCT based on user-independent automatic fiducial registration. Results: Overall mean value (MV +/- SD) residual error after BAT based on fiducial registration by CBCT was 0.7 +/- 1.7 mm in x (group systematic error [M] = 0.5 mm; SD of systematic error [Sigma] = 0.8 mm; SD of random error [sigma] 1.4 mm), 0.9 +/- 3.3 mm in y (M = 0.5 mm, Sigma = 2.2 mm, sigma = 2.8 mm), and - 1.7 +/- 3.4 turn in z (M = - 1.7 mm, Sigma = 2.3 mm, sigma = 3.0 mm) directions, whereas residual error relative to positioning based on skin marks was 2.1 +/- 4.6 mm in x (M = 2.6 mm, Sigma = 3.3 mm, sigma = 3.9 mm), -4.8 +/- 8.5 mm in y (M = -4.4 mm, Sigma = 3.7 mm, sigma = 6.7 mm), and -5.2 +/- 3.6 mm in z (M = -4.8 mm, Sigma = 1.7 mm, sigma = 3.5mm) directions and relative to positioning based on bony anatomy was 0 +/- 1.8 mm in x (M = 0.2 mm, Sigma = 0.9 mm, sigma = 1.1 mm), -3.5 +/- 6.8 mm in y (M = -3.0 mm, Sigma = 1.8 mm, sigma = 3.7 mm), and -1.9 +/- 5.2 mm in z (M = -2.0 mm, Sigma = 1.3 mm, sigma = 4.0 mm) directions. Conclusions: BAT improved the daily repositioning accuracy over skin marks or even bony anatomy. The results obtained with BAT are within the precision of extracranial stereotactic procedures and represent values that can be achieved with several users with different education levels. If sonographic visibility is insufficient, CBCT or kV/MV portal imaging with implanted fiducials are recommended. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1255
页数:9
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Online ultrasound image guidance for radiotherapy of prostate cancer: Impact of image acquisition on prostate displacement [J].
Artignan, X ;
Smitsmans, MHP ;
Lebesque, JV ;
Jaffray, DA ;
van Her, M ;
Bartelink, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02) :595-601
[2]   IMPACT OF SURGICAL STAGING IN EVALUATING THE RADIOTHERAPEUTIC OUTCOME IN RTOG PHASE-III STUDY FOR A2-PROSTATE AND B-PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
ASBELL, SO ;
MARTZ, KL ;
PILEPICH, MV ;
BAERWALD, HH ;
SAUSE, WT ;
DOGGETT, RL ;
PEREZ, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 17 (05) :945-951
[3]   CONTROL OF PROSTATE-CANCER WITH RADIOTHERAPY - LONG-TERM RESULTS [J].
BAGSHAW, MA ;
COX, RS ;
HANCOCK, SL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1781-1785
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE MOVEMENT OVER THE COURSE OF ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS [J].
BALTER, JM ;
SANDLER, HM ;
LAM, K ;
BREE, RL ;
LICHTER, AS ;
TENHAKEN, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01) :113-118
[5]   MAXIMIZING SETUP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES AS APPLIED TO A CONFORMAL BOOST TECHNIQUE FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
BIJHOLD, J ;
LEBESQUE, JV ;
HART, AAM ;
VIJLBRIEF, RE .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 24 (04) :261-271
[6]   A proposed strategy to implement CBCT images for replanning and dose calculations [J].
Boggula, R. ;
Wertz, H. ;
Lorenz, F. ;
Madyan, Y. Abo ;
Boda-Heggemann, J. ;
Schneider, F. ;
Polednik, M. ;
Hesser, J. ;
Lohr, F. ;
Wenz, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) :S655-S656
[7]  
Britton Keith R, 2005, Radiat Med, V23, P14
[8]   Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization [J].
Chandra, A ;
Dong, L ;
Huang, E ;
Kuban, DA ;
O'Neill, L ;
Rosen, I ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02) :436-447
[9]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: Assessment of prostate organ motion [J].
Chen, Jergin ;
Lee, R. Jeffrey ;
Handrahan, Diana ;
Sause, William T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :912-919
[10]   On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Chung, PWM ;
Haycocks, T ;
Brown, T ;
Cambridge, Z ;
Kelly, V ;
Alasti, H ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Catton, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01) :329-334