Interaction of urea with amino acids:: Implications for urea-induced protein denaturation

被引:286
作者
Stumpe, Martin C. [1 ]
Grubmueller, Helmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biophys Chem, Dept Theoret & Computat Biophys, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja076216j
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The molecular mechanism of urea-induced protein denaturation is not yet fully understood. Mainly two opposing mechanisms are controversially discussed, according to which either hydrophobic, or polar interactions are the dominant driving force. To resolve this question, we have investigated the interactions between urea and all 20 amino acids by comprehensive molecular dynamics simulations of 22 tripeptides. Calculation of atomic contact frequencies between the amino acids and solvent molecules revealed a clear profile of solvation preferences by either water or urea. Almost all amino acids showed preference for contacts with urea molecules, whereas charged and polar amino acids were found to have slight preferences for contact with water molecules. Particularly strong preference for contacts to urea were seen for aromatic and apolar side-chains, as well as for the protein backbone of all amino acids. Further, protein-urea hydrogen bonds were found to be significantly weaker than protein-water or water-water hydrogen bonds. Our results suggest that hydrophobic interactions are the dominant driving force, while hydrogen bonds between urea and the protein backbone contribute markedly to the overall energetics by avoiding unfavorable unsatisfied hydrogen bond sites on the backbone. In summary, we suggest a combined mechanism that unifies the two current and seemingly opposing views.
引用
收藏
页码:16126 / 16131
页数:6
相关论文
共 63 条
[31]   Aqueous urea solution destabilizes Aβ16-22 oligomers [J].
Klimov, DK ;
Straub, JE ;
Thirumalai, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (41) :14760-14765
[32]   Understanding protein hydrogen bond formation with kinetic H/D amide isotope effects [J].
Krantz, BA ;
Srivastava, AK ;
Nauli, S ;
Baker, D ;
Sauer, RT ;
Sosnick, TR .
NATURE STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (06) :458-463
[33]   CALORIMETRIC STUDIES OF HYDROPHOBIC NATURE OF SEVERAL PROTEIN CONSTITUENTS + OVALBUMIN IN WATER + IN AQUEOUS UREA [J].
KRESHECK, GC ;
BENJAMIN, L .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1964, 68 (09) :2476-&
[34]   Atomic and residue hydrophilicity in the context of folded protein structures [J].
Kuhn, LA ;
Swanson, CA ;
Pique, ME ;
Tainer, JA ;
Getzoff, ED .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 1995, 23 (04) :536-547
[35]   Does urea denature hydrophobic interactions? [J].
Lee, ME ;
van der Vegt, NFA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 128 (15) :4948-4949
[36]   GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis [J].
Lindahl, E ;
Hess, B ;
van der Spoel, D .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING, 2001, 7 (08) :306-317
[37]   PROTEIN INTERACTIONS WITH UREA AND GUANIDINIUM CHLORIDE - A CALORIMETRIC STUDY [J].
MAKHATADZE, GI ;
PRIVALOV, PL .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 226 (02) :491-505
[38]   Molecular basis for the effect of urea and guanidinium chloride on the dynamics of unfolded polypeptide chains [J].
Möglich, A ;
Krieger, F ;
Kiefhaber, T .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 345 (01) :153-162
[39]   Molecular dynamics simulations of end-to-end contact formation in hydrocarbon chains in water and aqueous urea solution [J].
Mountain, RD ;
Thirumalai, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 125 (07) :1950-1957
[40]   A MODEL FOR THE PARTIAL REVERSAL OF HYDROPHOBIC HYDRATION BY ADDITION OF A UREA-LIKE COSOLVENT [J].
MULLER, N .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 94 (09) :3856-3859