Denoising based on spatial filtering

被引:166
作者
de Cheveigne, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simon, Jonathan Z. [4 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, UMR 8158, Lab Psychol Percept, F-75700 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Paris, France
[3] Ecole Normale Super, Dept Etudes Cognit, Paris, France
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Biol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
magnetoencephalography; electroencephalography; noise reduction; artifact removal; principal component analysis; blind source separation; independent component analysis; denoising source separation; regression;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.03.015
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 [生物化学与分子生物学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
We present a method for removing unwanted components of biological origin from neurophysiological recordings such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), electroencephalography (EEG), or multichannel electrophysiological or optical recordings. A spatial filter is designed to partition recorded activity into stimulus-related and stimulus-unrelated components, based on a criterion of stimulus-evoked reproducibility. Components that are not reproducible are projected out to obtain clean data. In experiments that measure stimulus-evoked activity, typically about 80% of noise power is removed with minimal distortion of the evoked response. Signal-to-noise ratios of better than 0 dB (50% reproducible power) may be obtained for the single most reproducible spatial component. The spatial filters are synthesized using a blind source separation method known as denoising source separation (DSS) that allows the measure of interest (here proportion of evoked power) to guide the source separation. That method is of greater general use, allowing data denoising beyond the classical stimulus-evoked response paradigm. (c) 2008 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 339
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
SAMPLING THEORY FOR NEUROMAGNETIC DETECTOR ARRAYS [J].
AHONEN, AI ;
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
ILMONIEMI, RJ ;
KAJOLA, MJ ;
KNUUTILA, JET ;
SIMOLA, JT ;
VILKMAN, VA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 40 (09) :859-869
[2]
[Anonymous], 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
[3]
[Anonymous], 1995, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, DOI DOI 10.1097/00004691-199104000-00007
[4]
Electromagnetic brain mapping [J].
Baillet, S ;
Mosher, JC ;
Leahy, RM .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2001, 18 (06) :14-30
[5]
Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals [J].
Barbati, G ;
Porcaro, C ;
Zappasodi, F ;
Rossini, PM ;
Tecchio, F .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (05) :1220-1232
[6]
Spatial filter approach for evaluation of the surface Laplacian of the electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram [J].
Bradshaw, LA ;
Wikswo, JP .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 29 (03) :202-213
[7]
Cichocki A., 2004, INT J BIOELECTROMAGN, V6, P1
[8]
Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review [J].
Croft, RJ ;
Barry, RJ .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 30 (01) :5-19
[9]
Identifying and reducing noise in psychophysiological recordings [J].
Cutmore, TRH ;
James, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 32 (02) :129-150
[10]
Sensor noise suppression [J].
de Cheveigne, Alain ;
Simon, Jonathan Z. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2008, 168 (01) :195-202