Comorbidity between verbal and non-verbal cognitive delays in 2-year-olds: a bivariate twin analysis

被引:21
作者
Purcell, S
Eley, TC
Dale, PS
Oliver, B
Petrill, SA
Price, TS
Saudino, KJ
Simonoff, E
Stevenson, J
Taylor, E
Plomin, R
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Social Genet & Dev Psychiat Res Ctr, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Wesleyan Univ, Middletown, CT USA
[4] Boston Univ, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Univ Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-7687.00165
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the genetic and environmental aetiology of the comorbidity between verbal delay and non-verbal delay, in infancy. For more than 3000 pairs of 2-year-old twins born in England and Wales in 1994, we assessed verbal (vocabulary, V) and non-verbal (non-verbal, P) performance. V delay probands were selected who were in the lowest 5% of V; P delay probands from the lowest 5% of P. We assessed the comorbidity of delay both categorically, using twin cross-concordances, and dimensionally, by applying a bivariate extension of DeFries and Fulker (DF) group analysis. Both approaches are bidirectional, in that probands can be selected for either V delay (and analysed in relation to their co-twin's P score) or P delay (analysed in relation to their co-twin's V score). From a categorical perspective, twin cross-concordances indicated that comorbidity between V delay and P delay is substantially due to genetic factors whether probands are selected for V delay or for P delay. MZ and DZ cross-concordances were 24% and 8%, respectively, for probands selected for V delay and 27% and 6% for probands selected for P delay. From a dimensional perspective using bivariate DF analysis, selecting for V delay yielded high bivariate group heritability (0.59) and a genetic correlation of 1.0. In contrast, when selecting on P, DF analysis indicated lower bivariate group heritability (0.20) and only a modest genetic correlation with V assessed dimensionally (0.36). These results are discussed in terms of the difference between categorical and dimensional approaches to quantitative traits and the bidirectional nature of comorbidity. Such multivariate genetic results could lead to diagnostic systems that are based on causes rather than phenotypic descriptions of symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 208
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[31]   Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy [J].
Price, TS ;
Eley, TC ;
Dale, PS ;
Stevenson, J ;
Saudino, K ;
Plomin, R .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 71 (04) :948-959
[32]   How specific are ''specific developmental disorders''? The relevance of the concept of specific developmental disorders for the classification of childhood developmental disorders [J].
Rispens, J ;
vanYperen, TA .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 38 (03) :351-363
[33]   The validity of parent-based assessment of the cognitive abilities of 2-year-olds [J].
Saudino, KJ ;
Dale, PS ;
Oliver, B ;
Petrill, SA ;
Richardson, V ;
Rutter, M ;
Simonoff, E ;
Stevenson, J ;
Plomin, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 16 :349-363
[34]  
SMITH C, 1974, AM J HUM GENET, V26, P454
[35]   HYPERACTIVITY AND SPELLING DISABILITY - TESTING FOR SHARED GENETIC ETIOLOGY [J].
STEVENSON, J ;
PENNINGTON, BF ;
GILGER, JW ;
DEFRIES, JC ;
GILLIS, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY AND ALLIED DISCIPLINES, 1993, 34 (07) :1137-1152
[36]   Heritability of poor language achievement among twins [J].
Tomblin, JB ;
Buckwalter, PR .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (01) :188-199
[37]   RETARDATION AND TWIN CONCORDANCE IN INFANT MENTAL DEVELOPMENT - REASSESSMENT [J].
WILSON, RS ;
MATHENY, AP .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1976, 6 (03) :353-358