Category assignment and relatedness in the group ideation process

被引:31
作者
Baruah, Jonahi [1 ]
Paulus, Paul B. [2 ]
机构
[1] So Methodist Univ, Dept Psychol, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Brainstorming; Group creativity; Idea generation; Interdisciplinary group; Diverse group; Diversity; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; GENERATION; CREATIVITY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When groups gather to generate creative ideas on a particular topic, they can consider many aspects or components of the problem. Because such a multitude of alternatives can be overwhelming, groups may find it helpful to focus on specific aspects or categories of the problem. However, it is not clear whether it is best for group members to focus on the same components of the problem at the same time or whether it is better for group members to focus on different components of the problem. Furthermore, the impact of this type of focus may depend on the extent to which the different components of the problem are closely related semantically. It may be easier to generate ideas in semantically related areas but semantically unrelated areas may stimulate generation of more creative ideas. The present study provided a comprehensive test of the effects of task components or category assignment and the degree of relatedness of the assigned categories on the creativity of groups. Groups that were jointly assigned a small set of categories to focus on at the beginning of their session generated more ideas, explored more categories and exhibited higher clustering of similar ideas than the groups whose members were assigned their own unique category. The groups assigned with low related categories surveyed more categories than those assigned with categories of high relatedness. This study suggests that interdisciplinary or diverse groups or teams should have some common focus in the initial phase of their creative sessions and focus on unrelated aspects of the problem in this phase. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1077
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? [J].
Iyengar, SS ;
Lepper, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 79 (06) :995-1006
[22]   SOCIAL LOAFING - A METAANALYTIC REVIEW AND THEORETICAL INTEGRATION [J].
KARAU, SJ ;
WILLIAMS, KD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 65 (04) :681-706
[23]   Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation [J].
Kramer, TJ ;
Fleming, GP ;
Mannis, SM .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2001, 32 (05) :533-557
[24]  
Lamm H., 1973, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V3, P362
[25]   Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance [J].
Larey, TS ;
Paulus, PB .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1999, 12 (03) :175-184
[26]  
Mannix Elizabeth, 2005, Psychol Sci Public Interest, V6, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
[27]   Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups [J].
Milliken, FJ ;
Martins, LL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1996, 21 (02) :402-433
[28]  
Mobley M.I., 1992, Creativity Research Journal, V5, P125, DOI DOI 10.1080/10400419209534428
[29]   PRODUCTIVITY LOSS IN BRAINSTORMING GROUPS - A META-ANALYTIC INTEGRATION [J].
MULLEN, B ;
JOHNSON, C ;
SALAS, E .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 12 (01) :3-23
[30]   CREATIVITY SYNDROME - INTEGRATION, APPLICATION, AND INNOVATION [J].
MUMFORD, MD ;
GUSTAFSON, SB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (01) :27-43