Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes around implants: A pilot study

被引:27
作者
Joly, JC [1 ]
de Lima, AFM [1 ]
da Silva, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Dent Piracicaba, Dept Prosthodont & Periodont, BR-13414018 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
bone loss/prevention and control; follow-up studies; peri-implant diseases/prevention and control;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1097
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic changes in the peri-implant tissues around one-stage implants with different smooth neck portion lengths before and after functional prosthetic loading. Methods: Twelve one-stage implants were placed in adult patients with bilateral edentulous posterior mandibular ridges. The sites were randomly assigned into two groups of six each: group 1: 2.8 mm neck implants and group 2: neck implants. The parameters plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), gingival margin level (GML), relative clinical attachment level (r-CAL), and optical density (OD) were measured at loading (4 months) and 12 months after implant placement. The radiographic parameter osseous level (OL) was measured at implant placement, loading, and at 12 months. Analysis of variance and the paired Student t test were used to detect difference over time and between groups. Results: The results showed significant differences (P<0.05) for both groups for PD, r-CAL, and OL for intragroup comparisons over time. However, no significant differences were found for PI, GI, PD, GML, OD, and OL for between-group comparisons. Conclusion: Bony loss occurred before loading, supporting the soft tissues and maintaining the biologic width irrespective of the smooth portion length.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1103
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J PERIODONTOL
[3]  
BRAGGER U, 1991, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, V6, P160
[4]   Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants [J].
Bragger, U ;
Hafeli, U ;
Huber, B ;
Hammerle, CHF ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (04) :218-224
[5]  
Buser D, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P405
[6]   Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible [J].
Cochran, DL ;
Hermann, JS ;
Schenk, RK ;
Higginbottom, FL ;
Buser, D .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (02) :186-197
[7]   A METHOD FOR THE GEOMETRIC AND DENSITOMETRIC STANDARDIZATION OF INTRAORAL RADIOGRAPHS [J].
DUCKWORTH, JE ;
JUDY, PF ;
GOODSON, JM ;
SOCRANSKY, SS .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1983, 54 (07) :435-440
[8]   DIMENSIONS AND RELATIONS OF DENTOGINGIVAL JUNCTION IN HUMANS [J].
GARGIULO, AW ;
WENTZ, FM ;
ORBAN, B .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1961, 32 (03) :261-&
[9]   The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI(R) implants on marginal soft and hard tissues [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Bragger, U ;
Burgin, W ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (02) :111-119
[10]  
Herman GT, 2000, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V11, P12, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(2000)11:1<12::AID-IMA3>3.0.CO