The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions

被引:11
作者
Ettinger, M. [1 ]
Wehrhahn, T. [2 ]
Petri, M. [2 ]
Liodakis, E. [2 ]
Olender, G. [3 ]
Albrecht, U. -V. [4 ]
Hurschler, C. [3 ]
Krettek, C. [2 ]
Jagodzinski, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch MHH, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch MHH, Trauma Dept, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch MHH, Lab Biomech & Biomat, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
[4] Hannover Med Sch MHH, Inst Legal Med, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Knee; Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); Press fit; Hamstring tendon; Quadriceps tendon; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; GRAFT FIXATION; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; HAMSTRING TENDONS; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; INLAY; BUNDLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-011-1584-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
A secure tibial press-fit technique in posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions is an interesting technique because no hardware is necessary. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, a few press-fit procedures have been published. Up to the present point, no biomechanical data exist for a tibial press-fit posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to characterize a press-fit procedure for PCL reconstruction that is biomechanically equivalent to an interference screw fixation. Quadriceps and hamstring tendons of 20 human cadavers (age: 49.2 +/- A 18.5 years) were used. A press-fit fixation with a knot in the semitendinosus tendon (K) and a quadriceps tendon bone block graft (Q) were compared to an interference screw fixation (I) in 30 porcine femora. In each group, nine constructs were cyclically stretched and then loaded until failure. Maximum load to failure, stiffness, and elongation during failure testing and cyclical loading were investigated. The maximum load to failure was 518 +/- A 157 N (387-650 N) for the (K) group, 558 +/- A 119 N (466-650 N) for the (I) group, and 620 +/- A 102 N (541-699 N) for the (Q) group. The stiffness was 55 +/- A 27 N/mm (18-89 N/mm) for the (K) group, 117 +/- A 62 N/mm (69-165 N/mm) for the (I) group, and 65 +/- A 21 N/mm (49-82 N/mm) for the (Q) group. The stiffness of the (I) group was significantly larger (P = 0.01). The elongation during cyclical loading was significantly larger for all groups from the 1st to the 5th cycle compared to the elongation in between the 5th to the 20th cycle (P < 0.03). All techniques exhibited larger elongation during initial loading. Load to failure and stiffness was significantly different between the fixations. The Q fixation showed equal biomechanical properties compared to a pure tendon fixation (I) with an interference screw. All three fixation techniques that were investigated exhibit comparable biomechanical properties. Preconditioning of the constructs is critical. Clinical trials have to investigate the biological effectiveness of these fixation techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 314
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments [J].
Amis, AA ;
Gupte, CM ;
Bull, AMJ ;
Edwards, A .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (03) :257-263
[2]
[Anonymous], T ORTHOP RES SOC
[3]
Interference screw fixation of hamstring vs patellar tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Aune A.K. ;
Ekeland A. ;
Cawley P.W. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1998, 6 (2) :99-102
[4]
A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques [J].
Bergfeld, JA ;
McAllister, DR ;
Parker, RD ;
Valdevit, ADC ;
Kambic, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (02) :129-136
[5]
A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using single- and double-bundle tibial inlay techniques [J].
Bergfeld, JA ;
Graham, SM ;
Parker, RD ;
Valdevit, ADC ;
Kambic, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (07) :976-981
[6]
Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps tendon fixation with patellar tendon bone plug interference fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Brand, J ;
Hamilton, D ;
Selby, J ;
Pienkowski, D ;
Caborn, DNM ;
Johnson, DL .
ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 16 (08) :805-812
[7]
BROWN CH, 1993, CLIN SPORT MED, V12, P723
[8]
Biomechanical comparison between BioScrew and titanium alloy interference screws for bone-patellar tendon-bone graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Caborn, DNM ;
Urban, WP ;
Johnson, DL ;
Nyland, J ;
Pienkowski, D .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1997, 13 (02) :229-232
[9]
Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Campbell, R. Brick ;
Torrie, Alec ;
Heckert, Aaron ;
Sekiya, Jon K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (10) :1731-1738
[10]
Fixation strength of three different graft types used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Chen, CH ;
Chou, SW ;
Chen, WJ ;
Shih, CH .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2004, 12 (05) :371-375