Value of high-cost cancer care: A behavioral science perspective

被引:24
作者
Weinfurt, Kevin P.
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Res Inst, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9029
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Concerns about the high costs of cancer care have led to a renewed interest in understanding how patients value the outcomes of care. Psychologists, economists, and others have highlighted some of the ways in which patients and caregivers perceive and make treatment decisions. Prospect theory is the predominant framework for understanding decisions made in situations where the outcomes of each choice are uncertain. Prospect theory assumes that a patient values the outcomes of care not in absolute terms, such as years of life saved, but as deviations from the patient's point of reference. This article discusses some of the implications of this notion, along with discussing differences among people in their reference points. These and other considerations from the psychology of decision making help to clarify why some patients might be inclined to seek expensive or risky treatments in the hopes of achieving benefits that others might consider not worthwhile. An appreciation of these psychological issues might improve the quality of debates concerning the rising costs of cancer care.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 227
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   WHOSE UTILITIES FOR DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
SUTHERLAND, HJ ;
HEASMAN, KZ ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
CUMMINGS, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (01) :58-67
[2]   An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients [J].
Gaskin, DJ ;
Weinfurt, KR ;
Castel, LD ;
DePuy, V ;
Li, Y ;
Balshem, A ;
Benson, A ;
Burnett, CB ;
Corbett, S ;
Marshall, J ;
Slater, E ;
Sulmasy, DR ;
Van Echo, D ;
Meropol, NJ ;
Schulman, KA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2004, 24 (06) :614-624
[3]   Treatment choices by seriously Ill patients: The health stock risk adjustment model [J].
Gaskin, DJ ;
Kong, J ;
Meropol, NJ ;
Yabroff, KR ;
Weaver, C ;
Schulman, KA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (01) :84-94
[4]  
Hacking Ian., 1975, The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference
[5]   Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002 [J].
Horstmann, E ;
McCabe, MS ;
Grochow, L ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Rubinstein, L ;
Budd, T ;
Shoemaker, D ;
Emanuel, EJ ;
Grady, C .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (09) :895-904
[6]  
Jansen Lynn A, 2006, IRB, V28, P13
[7]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[8]  
KAHNEMAN D, 2006, VALUE HEALTH, V9, P65
[9]  
Loewenstein G., 1999, Wellbeing: The foundations of hedonic psychology, P85
[10]   ON THE ELICITATION OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES [J].
MCNEIL, BJ ;
PAUKER, SG ;
SOX, HC ;
TVERSKY, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 306 (21) :1259-1262