Nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopic ultrasonography

被引:48
作者
Fatima, Hala [1 ]
DeWitt, John [1 ]
LeBlanc, Julia [1 ]
Sherman, Stuart [1 ]
McGreevy, Kathleen [1 ]
Imperiale, Thomas F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01906.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the safety of nurse-administered propofol sedation (NAPS) for advanced endoscopy. AIMS: To evaluate the frequency of and the risk factors for complications associated with NAPS for upper endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). METHODS: Consecutive upper EUS examinations using NAPS were retrospectively identified. Clinical data and adverse events were recorded. Univariate and multivariable repeated measures logistic regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for complications. RESULTS: Among 806 EUS procedures, the mean procedure duration, time for sedation induction, and postprocedure recovery time were: 34 +/- 20 min, 3.6 +/- 1.4 min, and 27 +/- 23 min, respectively. A decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP) to < 90 mm Hg occurred in 104 patients (13%). Six patients (0.7%) had a decline in oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) to < 90%. Four patients (0.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-1.27) required assisted positive pressure ventilation. There were no major complications. The minor complication rate from sedation was 21% (95% CI 17.2-25.3). All of the complications were clinically insignificant. Overall complication risk was not related to age, dose, or procedure time. Sedation-related complication rates for advanced experience-level (>= 100 NAPS procedures) nurses were lower compared to the least-experienced (<= 30 NAPS procedures) nurses (17.2% vs 25.4%, odds ratio [OR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: NAPS for upper EUS is safe and may be performed without major complications. Four patients (0.5%) required assisted ventilation. Minor complications occurred in 21% of patients, but were not associated with patient age, propofol dose, or procedure time.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1656
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Correlating in vivo anaesthetic effects with ex vivo receptor density data supports a GABAergic mechanism of action for propofol, but not for isoflurane [J].
Alkire, MT ;
Haier, RJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (05) :618-626
[2]
Review article: registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy [J].
Chen, SC ;
Rex, DK .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 (02) :147-155
[3]
Chen Wei-Xing, 2005, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, V4, P437
[4]
Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists [J].
Clarke, AC ;
Chiragakis, L ;
Hillman, LC ;
Kaye, GL .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (04) :158-161
[5]
Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperldine/fentanyl, and midazolam [J].
Cohen, LB ;
Hightower, CD ;
Wood, DA ;
Miller, KM ;
Aisenberg, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (07) :795-803
[6]
Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist [J].
Cohen, LB ;
Dubovsky, AN ;
Aisenberg, J ;
Miller, KM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (05) :725-732
[7]
Deep sedation for endoscopic procedures: safety and benefit of a combination of midazolam and propofol [J].
Cordruwisch, W ;
Doroschko, M ;
Wurbs, D .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2000, 125 (20) :619-622
[8]
Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial [J].
Fanti, L. ;
Agostoni, M. ;
Arcidiacono, P. G. ;
Albertin, A. ;
Strini, G. ;
Carrara, S. ;
Guslandi, M. ;
Torri, G. ;
Testoni, P. A. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (01) :81-86
[9]
Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP [J].
Fanti, L ;
Agostoni, M ;
Casati, A ;
Guslandi, M ;
Giollo, P ;
Torri, G ;
Testoni, PA .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (03) :361-366
[10]
The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national Web survey [J].
Faulx, AL ;
Vela, S ;
Das, A ;
Cooper, G ;
Sivak, MV ;
Isenberg, G ;
Chak, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (01) :9-15