Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration - An exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses

被引:48
作者
Meyer, M [1 ]
Bhattacharya, S
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Freeman Ctr, SPRU Sci & Technol Policy Res, Brighton BN1 9QE, E Sussex, England
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Steunpunt O&O Stat, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Natl Inst Sci Technol & Dev Studies, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045120.04489.80
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Co-authorship analysis is a well-established tool in bibliometric analysis. It can be used at various levels to trace collaborative links between individuals, organisations, or countries. Increasingly, informetric methods are applied to patent data. It has been shown for another method that bibliometric tools cannot be applied without difficulty. This is due to the different process in which a patent is filed, examined, and granted and a scientific paper is submitted, refereed and published. However, in spite of the differences, there are also parallels between scholarly papers and patents. For instance, both papers and patents are the result of an intellectual effort, both disclose relevant information, and both are subject to a process of examination. Given the similarities, we shall raise the question as to which extent one can transfer co-authorship analysis to patent data.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Large firms and the science-technology interface - Patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films [J].
Bhattacharya, S ;
Meyer, M .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 58 (02) :265-279
[2]   Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology [J].
Bhattacharya, S ;
Kretschmer, H ;
Meyer, M .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2003, 58 (02) :369-390
[3]   Monitoring technology trends through patent analysis: a case study of thin film [J].
Bhattacharya, S ;
Khan, MTR .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2001, 10 (01) :33-45
[4]   Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: public-private, EU-US R&D partnerships [J].
Carayannis, EG ;
Laget, P .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (01) :17-31
[5]   Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix [J].
Rickard Danell ;
Olle Persson .
Scientometrics, 2003, 58 (2) :203-218
[6]   The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm [J].
Etzkowitz, H ;
Webster, A ;
Gebhardt, C ;
Terra, BRC .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) :313-330
[7]   National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations [J].
Glänzel, W .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (01) :69-115
[8]   Double effort = Double impact?: A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry [J].
Glänzel, W ;
Schubert, A .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 50 (02) :199-214
[9]  
Glanzel W., 2004, HDB BIBLIOMETRIC IND
[10]   What is research collaboration? [J].
Katz, JS ;
Martin, BR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (01) :1-18