On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty

被引:710
作者
Yang, JB [1 ]
Xu, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Manchester Sch Management, Manchester M60 1QD, Lancs, England
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS | 2002年 / 32卷 / 03期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
assessment; evidential reasoning; multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA); uncertainty; utility interval;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802746
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In multiple attribute decision analysis (MADA), one often needs to deal with both numerical data and qualitative information with uncertainty. It is essential to properly represent and use uncertain information to conduct rational decision analysis. Based on a multilevel evaluation framework, an evidential reasoning (ER) approach has been developed for supporting such decision analysis, the kernel of which is an ER algorithm developed on the basis of the framework and the evidence combination rule of the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory. The approach has. been applied to engineering design selection, organizational self-assessment safety and risk assessment, and supplier assessment. In this paper, the fundamental features of the ER approach are investigated. New schemes for weight normalization and basic probability assignments are proposed. The original ER approach is. further developed to enhance the process of aggregating attributes with uncertainty. Utility intervals are proposed to describe the impact of ignorance on decision analysis. Several properties of the new ER approach are explored, which lay the theoretical foundation of the ER approach. A numerical example of a motorcycle evaluation problem is examined using the ER approach. Computation steps and analysis results are provided in order to demonstrate its implementation process.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 304
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Saaty T.L., 1988, The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation
[12]   MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING IN DESIGN SELECTION AND SYNTHESIS [J].
SEN, P ;
YANG, JB .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 1995, 6 (03) :207-230
[13]  
Shafer G., 1976, A mathematical theory of evidence, V76
[14]   A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
STEWART, TJ .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 20 (5-6) :569-586
[15]   Multi-person and multi-attribute design evaluations using evidential reasoning based on subjective safety and cost analyses [J].
Wang, J ;
Yang, JB ;
Sen, P .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1996, 52 (02) :113-128
[16]   A subjective methodology for safety analysis of safety requirements specifications [J].
Wang, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 1997, 5 (03) :418-430
[17]   SAFETY ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS USING FUZZY-SETS AND EVIDENTIAL REASONING [J].
WANG, J ;
YANG, JB ;
SEN, P .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 47 (02) :103-118
[18]  
WANG J, 2001, INT J SAF QUAL RELIA, V8, P35, DOI DOI 10.1142/S0218539301000335
[19]   A SURVEY ON THE INTEGRATION OF DECISION-ANALYSIS AND EXPERT SYSTEMS FOR DECISION SUPPORT [J].
WHITE, CC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1990, 20 (02) :358-364
[20]  
Winston W., 2003, OPERATIONS RES APPL