Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care

被引:219
作者
Neumann, PJ [1 ]
Goldie, SJ [1 ]
Weinstein, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Program Econ Evaluat Med Technol, Ctr Risk Anal, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
utilities; preferences; quality-adjusted life years gained; QALYS; cost-utility analysis;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Estimating preferences for states of health has been an active area of research in recent years. Unlike psychophysical approaches, which discriminate levels of health status, preference-based approaches incorporate values or utilities for health outcomes and can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses to aid resource allocation decisions. This chapter considers issues and controversies involved in using preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care, with a particular emphasis on cost-utility analysis and the estimation of quality-adjusted life years. Topics considered include techniques for measuring preferences, the use of preference-based classification systems, the relationship between patient and community preferences, methods for obtaining utilities from clinical trials, mapping health status from health utilities, the development of "off-the-shelf" preference weights, and proposed alternatives to quality-adjusted lift: years. We also consider applications of cost-utility analyses to public health interventions. Although cost-utility analyses have become more popular recently, many challenges remain for the held, Widespread acceptance of the methodology likely awaits more consensus on measurement techniques, as well as educational efforts in the public health and medical communities on the usefulness of the approach.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 611
页数:25
相关论文
共 146 条
[71]   The view from managed care pharmacy [J].
Luce, BR ;
Lyles, CA ;
Rentz, AM .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1996, 15 (04) :168-176
[72]   The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population [J].
Lundberg, L ;
Johannesson, M ;
Isacson, DGL ;
Borgquist, L .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (02) :128-140
[73]   The development of the functional capacity index [J].
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Damiano, A ;
Miller, T ;
Luchter, S .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 41 (05) :799-807
[74]   HEPATITIS-B VACCINATION THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES [J].
MANGTANI, P ;
HALL, AJ ;
NORMAND, CEM .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (03) :238-244
[75]  
MCINTYRE P, 1994, AUST J PUBLIC HEALTH, V18, P394
[76]   HEALTHY-YEARS EQUIVALENTS VERSUS QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS - IN PURSUIT OF PROGRESS [J].
MEHREZ, A ;
GAFNI, A .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (04) :287-292
[77]   QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS, UTILITY-THEORY, AND HEALTHY-YEARS EQUIVALENTS [J].
MEHREZ, A ;
GAFNI, A .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1989, 9 (02) :142-149
[78]  
Messonnier ML, 1999, AM J PREV MED, V16, P373
[79]   EVALUATION OF LIFE AND LIMB - THEORETICAL APPROACH [J].
MISHAN, EJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1971, 79 (04) :687-705
[80]   HYE and TTO: What is the difference? [J].
Morrison, GC .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (05) :563-578