The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy

被引:17
作者
Cervini, P
Smith, LC
Urbach, DR
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Div Gen Surg, Minimally Invas Surg Program, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Div Clin Decis Making & Hlth Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2002年 / 16卷 / 12期
关键词
laparoscopic appendectomy; clinical decision making; appendicitis;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-002-8521-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic and open approaches are commonly used for appendectomy. No previous studies have specifically examined which factors determine whether a laparoscopic or open approach is used for appendectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 140 patients who underwent a laparoscopic (n = 60) or open (n = 80) appendectomy between January 2000 and April 2001 at our hospital. Medical records were reviewed, and the data were analyzed using chi-square analysis, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multivariate logistic regression. We studied patient age, gender, type of surgeon on call, leukocyte count, pathology, and the use of diagnostic imaging to determine whether there was any association with the use of a laparoscopic approach. Results: The type of surgeon on call was strongly correlated with a laparoscopic approach. Of the 61 appendectornies performed by laparoscopic surgeons (those who use laparoscopy for operations other than appendectornies and cholecystectomies), 55 (90%) were laparoscopic and 6 (10%) were open. Of the 79 appendectornies performed by nonlaparoscopic surgeons, 5 (6%) were laparoscopic and 74 (94%) were open (multivariate odds ratio, 136; 95% confidence interval, 39475; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The surgeon on call when a patient is admitted is an important factor determining whether a patient will receive a laparoscopic or open appendectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1774 / 1777
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
APELGREN KN, 1995, AM SURGEON, V61, P240
[2]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MINI CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BARKUN, JS ;
BARKUN, AN ;
SAMPALIS, JS ;
FRIED, G ;
TAYLOR, B ;
WEXLER, MJ ;
GORESKY, CA ;
MEAKINS, JL .
LANCET, 1992, 340 (8828) :1116-1119
[3]   LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL-PROCEDURES [J].
DONOHUE, JH .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1994, 69 (08) :758-762
[4]  
Hart R, 1996, CAN J SURG, V39, P457
[5]   Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy [J].
Hellberg, A ;
Rudberg, C ;
Kullman, E ;
Enochsson, L ;
Fenyö, G ;
Graffner, H ;
Hallerbäck, B ;
Johansson, B ;
Anderberg, B ;
Wenner, J ;
Ringqvist, I ;
Sörensen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) :48-53
[6]  
Hunter JG, 1997, AM J SURG, V173, P14, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00376-5
[7]  
Kahrau S, 1998, ZBL CHIR, V123, P17
[8]   Laparoscopic appendectomy - A comparison with open appendectomy [J].
Kluiber, RM ;
Hartsman, B .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1996, 39 (09) :1008-1011
[9]   Comparison of open and laparoscopic treatment of acute appendicitis [J].
Kurtz, RJ ;
Heimann, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (03) :211-214
[10]  
Nowzaradan Y, 1991, J Laparoendosc Surg, V1, P247