Evaluation of three rapid assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A and toxin B in stool specimens

被引:26
作者
Ruessman, H.
Panthel, K.
Bader, R-C.
Schmitt, C.
Schaumann, R.
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Max Von Pettenkofer Inst Hyg & Med Microbiol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Hyg & Microbiol, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Univ Leipzig, Inst Med Microbiol & Epidemiol Infect Dis, Natl Reference Lab Anaerobes, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10096-006-0251-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease continues to be difficult for clinical microbiology laboratories. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of three enzyme immunoassays for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B: the recently marketed rapid enzyme immunoassay Ridascreen Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) and two established enzyme immunoassays, the C. difficile Tox A/B II Assay (TechLab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) and the ProSpecT C. difficile Toxin A/B Microplate Assay (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA). Stool specimens (n = 383) from patients with a clinical diagnosis of antibiotic-associated diarrhea were examined by these three enzyme immunoassays and were additionally cultured for C. difficile on selective agar. Samples giving discordant enzyme immunoassay results underwent confirmatory testing by tissue culture cytotoxin B assay and by PCR for toxin A (tcdA) and toxin B (tcdB) genes from C. difficile. Using the criteria adopted for this study, 60 (15.7%) samples tested positive for toxins A and/or B. Sensitivity and specificity of the enzyme immunoassays were, respectively, 88.3 and 100% for the TechLab enzyme immunoassay, 91.7 and 100% for the R-Biopharm enzyme immunoassay, and 93.3 and 100% for the Remel enzyme immunoassay. The differences between these results are statistically not significant (p > 0.05). The results show that all three enzyme immunoassays are acceptable tests for the detection of C. difficile toxins A and B directly in fecal specimens or in toxigenic cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 119
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Electroporation of DNA sequences from the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) of toxigenic Clostridium difficile into a non-toxigenic strain [J].
Ackermann, G ;
Tang, YJ ;
Henderson, JP ;
Rodloff, AC ;
Silva, J ;
Cohen, SH .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2001, 15 (05) :301-306
[2]   Comparison of the TOX A/B test to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stools [J].
Aldeen, WE ;
Bingham, M ;
Aiderzada, A ;
Kucera, J ;
Jense, S ;
Carroll, KC .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2000, 36 (04) :211-213
[3]   NEW SELECTIVE MEDIUM FOR ISOLATING CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE FROM FECES [J].
ASPINALL, ST ;
HUTCHINSON, DN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1992, 45 (09) :812-814
[4]   A European survey of diagnostic methods and testing protocols for Clostridium difficile [J].
Barbut, F ;
Delmée, M ;
Brazier, JS ;
Petit, JC ;
Poxton, IR ;
Rupnik, M ;
Lalande, V ;
Schneider, C ;
Mastrantonio, P ;
Alonso, R ;
Kuipjer, E ;
Tvede, M .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2003, 9 (10) :989-996
[5]   COMPARISON OF 3 ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS, A CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY, AND TOXIGENIC CULTURE FOR DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA [J].
BARBUT, F ;
KAJZER, C ;
PLANAS, N ;
PETIT, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (04) :963-967
[6]   USEFULNESS OF CULTURE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION [J].
BOND, F ;
PAYNE, G ;
BORRIELLO, SP ;
HUMPHREYS, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 14 (03) :223-226
[7]   SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR THE ROUTINE ISOLATION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE FROM FECES [J].
BORRIELLO, SP ;
HONOUR, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1981, 34 (10) :1124-1127
[8]   'Second-look' cytotoxicity:: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD [J].
Bouza, E ;
Peláez, T ;
Alonso, R ;
Catalán, P ;
Muñoz, P ;
Créixems, MR .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2001, 48 (03) :233-237
[9]   Analysis of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile strains [J].
Cohen, SH ;
Tang, YJ ;
Silva, J .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 181 (02) :659-663
[10]   Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease [J].
Delmée, M .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2001, 7 (08) :411-416