Clinical MR-Mammography: Are Computer-Assisted Methods Superior to Visual or Manual Measurements for Curve Type Analysis? A Systematic Approach

被引:36
作者
Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Freiberg, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Beger, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Vag, Tibor [1 ,2 ]
Dietzel, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Herzog, Aimee B. [1 ,2 ]
Gajda, Mieczyslaw [3 ]
Camara, Oumar [4 ]
Kaiser, Werner A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Diagnost, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Inst Intervent Radiol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Jena, Inst Pathol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[4] Univ Jena, Clin Gynecol, D-07740 Jena, Germany
关键词
Computer-aided diagnosis; computer-assisted diagnosis; CAD; breast MRI; dynamic enhancement pattern; kinetics; curve type analysis; sensitivity and specificity; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE-VALUE; DETECTED BREAST-LESIONS; MALIGNANT LESIONS; GD-DTPA; QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT; DISCRIMINATING BENIGN; DYNAMIC MRI; TUMORS; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2009.03.017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. Enhancement characteristics after administration of a contrast agent are regarded as a major criterion for differential diagnosis in magnetic resonance mammography (MRM). However, no consensus exists about the best measurement method to assess contrast enhancement kinetics. This systematic investigation was performed to compare visual estimation with manual region of interest (ROI) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) analysis for time curve measurements in MRM. Materials and Methods. A total of 329 patients undergoing surgery after MRM (1.5 T) were analyzed prospectively. Dynamic data were measured using visual estimation, including ROI as well as CAD methods, and classified depending on initial signal increase and delayed enhancement. Results. Pathology revealed 469 lesions (279 malignant, 190 benign). Kappa agreement between the methods ranged from 0.78 to 0.81. Diagnostic accuracies of 74.4% (visual), 75.7% (ROI), and 76.6% (CAD) were found without statistical significant differences. Conclusions. According to our results, curve type measurements are useful as a diagnostic criterion in breast lesions irrespective of the method used.
引用
收藏
页码:1070 / 1076
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast [J].
Baum, F ;
Fischer, U ;
Vosshenrich, R ;
Grabbe, E .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (05) :1087-1092
[2]   Methods for quantitative assessment of tissue microcirculation using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Brix, G ;
Schreiber, W ;
Hoffmann, U ;
Guckel, F ;
Hawighorst, H ;
Knopp, MV .
RADIOLOGE, 1997, 37 (06) :470-480
[3]   Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI [J].
Chen, Weijie ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Newstead, Gillian M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (08) :2878-2887
[4]  
Fischer D R, 2004, Eur Radiol, V14, P394
[5]   Further signs in the evaluation of magnetic resonance mammography - A retrospective study [J].
Fischer, DR ;
Wurdinger, S ;
Boettcher, J ;
Malich, A ;
Kaiser, WA .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (07) :430-435
[6]   SIGNAL TIME-RELATION OF BENIGN AND MALIGNANT LESIONS IN DYNAMIC 2D-MR IMAGING OF THE BREAST [J].
FISCHER, U ;
VONHEYDEN, D ;
VOSSHENRICH, R ;
VIEWEG, I ;
GRABBE, E .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1993, 158 (04) :287-292
[7]   Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Liney, GP ;
Lowry, M ;
Kneeshaw, PJ ;
Turnbull, LW .
BREAST, 2004, 13 (02) :115-121
[8]   Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: Comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features [J].
Goto, Mariko ;
Ito, Hirotoshi ;
Akazawa, Kentaro ;
Kubota, Takao ;
Kizu, Osamu ;
Yamada, Kei ;
Nishimura, Tsunehiko .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (01) :104-112
[9]   Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography [J].
Hauth, EAM ;
Stockamp, C ;
Maderwald, S ;
Mühler, A ;
Kimmig, R ;
Jaeger, H ;
Barkhausen, J ;
Forsting, M .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2006, 30 (03) :160-165
[10]   International investigation of breast MRI:: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions [J].
Heywang-Körunner, SH ;
Bick, U ;
Bradley, WG ;
Boné, B ;
Casselman, J ;
Coulthard, A ;
Fischer, U ;
Müller-Schimpfle, M ;
Oellinger, H ;
Patt, R ;
Teubner, J ;
Friedrich, M ;
Newstead, G ;
Holland, R ;
Schauer, A ;
Sickles, EA ;
Tabar, L ;
Waisman, J ;
Wernecke, KD .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (04) :531-546